Time-Barred Debt equals false & misleading representation

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by jam237, Jun 19, 2013.

  1. jam237

    jam237 Well-Known Member

    Under FTC Settlement, Debt Buyer Agrees to Pay $2.5 Million for Alleged Consumer Deception

    I mentioned this a few times, and was always asked where I found it. :)

    Guess what, when I was looking up the CFPB/FTC divisions of powers, I found it.

    Page 10; paragraphs 30-34.

    Even though in 48 states the debt isn't extinguished, them not mentioning that the debt is time-barred, to entice into entering into a payment arrangement to re-start the SOL was a false & misleading representation.

    "If consumers knew, in connection with a past-statute debt, that Asset had no legal means to enforce collection of the debt, or understood that making a partial payment or a written to promise to pay would revive it, some consumers would likely choose not to make a payment or a written promise to pay."
     

Share This Page