Reaging paid debt?

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by doggboy, Aug 3, 2007.

  1. doggboy

    doggboy Member

    Hello all, this is my first post. I have been reading alot on this excelent forum, so thank you all, but I can't find the answer I need.

    I have an old Time Warner debt from 02 that I paid earlier this year. I know now I shouldn't have with out a PFD letter now, but that was before I found you guys. So the question is...on TU and EX it is shown as zero balance, reported 8-1-06 while EQ still shows a 134 balance repoted on 6-1-02. Are TU and EX reaging the debt? Also how is it the EQ still shows a balance on the account, should I dispute this with them?

    I am very new to all this, but I would like to buy a house in a few months so I need to clean some stuff up. Any advise would be appreciated.
     
  2. init2winit

    init2winit Well-Known Member

    No, they are not. They are reporting historical data on these dates. If they were re-aging they would change the DOLA or the DOFMD.

    Yes, I would dispute that.
     

Share This Page