I was hoping to find some answers in the FAQ's but the link is not working. I have been scouring the net the last few weeks, trying to gather all the information i need to begin repairing my and my husband's credit. Different sites give different information/advice. And nearly every site has a "start here" section, that has so many off-shoots of info that i get overwhelmed and lost. lol. I really need a step 1, step 2, step 3 type of thing. 1. I was considering first clearing up old address and name discrepancies, in hopes that this will help future disputes turn out in my favor. I don't want extra info on my reports helping anyone track down my records. Is this a good first step? And to do it, can i do it online, by phone, or do i have to do a certified mail type of thing for each and every inquiry or request of the CRA's? 2. If i decide to use a goodwill letter for some of the minor things, should i still dispute with the CRA first, in order to secure my rights to sue later? Or is it okay to attempt a goodwill letter before an official dispute? will it ruin my ability to dispute later if they say no? 3. When i dispute or ask for verification with the CRA's, is it safe or smart to list several items in one letter, or should i send separate letters for each dispute, even to the same CRA? And should these be sent certified? and if i should send individual letters for each and every dispute, should i stagger the mailings so that they don't get 7 letters from me all on one day, thus defeating the purpose of sending separate letters in the first place? 4. my husband has an account that i didn't identify at first, because the name is completely different than the company we actually had credit thru. (we had credit thru CitiBank, it shows up as Chase). Have these companies always been the same? On one report it shows late, but another report shows on time payments, and lists it in the positive section, even though it says it was closed by the credit grantor. Should i dispute that? it isn't even in the derogatory section. 5. the worst thing of all is a chargeoff for an old credit card back in 04. It is scheduled to come off the report in October of next year, but i wouldn't mind finding a way to get it off now. it was never sent to a collection, and is still listed under the original account (Target National Bank, Target Store Visa Card). Is there any way to get this removed? Can you point me to some threads/ideas on that? Or should i just let it go and wait a year for it to come off? 6. His report shows an old DUMB collection from Pacific Bell. Here is the story on this, maybe someone can help me figure out the best way to proceed. Back in 2003 we had switched our phone service from Pac Bell to AT&T. Somehow, we were being charged by both companies for all services, for months. They were impossible to work with, so we told both companies to cut off our services so we could get it straightened out. Paid what we rightfully owed to each company, & eventually, we reconnected with PacBell no problem. Fast forward to March of 2007, my husband was having a background check done for a new job and the investigator asked him about a collection account still open on his CR. It was for $54 by a collection agency for Pac Bell. It had been sitting there, reporting unpaid for all these years. Even though we had service with the company and had NEVER received any notices or bills or phone calls! We were in a pickle with him trying to get this new job and just wanted it cleared up, so we contacted the collection agency and paid it. Now it will continue on our report until 2010. I am really stumped on who to contact, and with which letter, etc. Can anyone help? I don't want to screw up. 7. We had a personal loan in 2001 and as of 2003 they show our first late payment. We had this payment set up to automatically draft out of our bank account in order to get a break on the interest rate. At some point, they weren't drafting the payment, and declared us delinquent. I of course SHOULD have realized our account was over by this amount for many months, but living paycheck to paycheck, it's easy for me to overlook something like this. lol. We eventually cleared it up with them and they resumed the automatic draft until 2004 when the same thing happened AGAIN. after that we quickly paid off the loan and quit dealing with them. Same as above, what is the best method of disputing this? I really appreciate any and all advice and imput. I am famous for second guessing myself, and even though i've been doing alot of reading and studying up on this, i just want to really make sure i handle it right for the best possible outcome.
1) I don't see any way that striking inaccurate addresses from your credit report can be a bad thing. Old addresses, I don't know. But if they're flat out wrong, remove 'em. AFAIK the CRA websites don't facilitate this, so you'll need to send a letter. No matter what, CMRR is always a good idea. 2) More details, please. How old / small are "the minor things"? Be careful of waking a sleeping dog; if you SOL expires in less than six months, just wait. AFAIK, the goodwill letter in no way affects your right to sue. But depending on the creditor, disputing with the CRA *could* alter the letter's likelihood of working. Consider a mom-and-pop service company to whom you owe $200 -- they're not going to feel like cutting you any favors if you force them (via a CRA dispute) to dig up and send documentation. A giant company like Citi, on the other hand, couldn't care less. 3) A lot of people say to never dispute with the CRAs online. I don't agree. I had a lot of stuff taken off, and it costs you *nothing*. Dispute online as "not mine / no knowledge". Offer no additional details. The worst possible outcome is that they ignore you, in which case you're no worse off than before. If you do contact the CRAs, I would send everything in one letter; federal law says nothing about giving up your rights if you make multiple claims. Also, understand that CRAs get a massive volume of mail daily; see my other post on "blending in with the crowd". DO NOT send a lengthy or threatening letter chock full of legal citations. Just say "The following entries on my credit report are invalid and require your immediate attention:", list the items / account numbers / amounts as they appear, and SAY NOTHING ELSE. 4) Chase and Citi are not the same. Dispute by saying "I don't know what this is". Give no further information; do NOT tell them why you're disputing. With any luck, they'll ask Chase to validate a Citi account and you'll be home free. 5) Dispute. But do not pay, no matter what, even if they say "listen, we'll wipe this out for a token payment of $5". To clarify, if any part of this process involves payment, stop and wait it out. 6) The best thing you can do is dispute it. Maybe the CA will have lost its paperwork. Incidentally, if you paid it in March 2007, it can now remain on your report until 2014, not 2010. Payments update the reporting SOL. 7) Dispute it. Again, never say why you're disputing; you are not required to give that information, even if the CA / CRA says you do. They are wrong. Just dispute it. Even though you know you owe it, maybe the amount or date or OC name is wrong. Dispute away.
Thank you for the reply. I just want to quickly clarify that NONE of these accounts are open nor do i owe anything on them. These are all old, settled, closed and waiting for their 7 years to be up. As for the collection account, that one should still have to come off in 2010 because that will be 7 years from the date i was "late". That is where the 7 years begins counting down.
forgot to add - one of the minor things for example is a Capital one Account, still open and in good standing save for a high balance to limit ratio. Years ago there were a few late payments that show up as a 30 and 60. This was during a move to another city, things got screwed up, but were immediately made right. Seeing as how the account is currently and since before and after that time always has been in good standing, i thought perhaps i should try a goodwill letter to Cap 1 directly rather than a dispute with the CRA first.
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought the reporting SOL was based on last activity. Hence the reason why you don't make a payment on a 6.5-year-old debt, even if it's legit.
No, the reporting SOL is based on the date that the account went delinquent and was never again brought current.
Now THAT is good news. I've been fighting off a lawsuit for a long while and it's beginning to look like I'm running out of room. If I wind up paying this (from 2004), it's nice to know it'll only be on my report until 2011 and not 2015. Excellent!