Thank you in advance. I don't know anything about collection agency's attorney's Processes etc. I have been out of work since Oct, 2008, due to a Workmans Comp Issue. I am not being allowed to return to work "out of concern for my safety and health." Anyway when I was working I paid on time and even paid it off a couple of times. I got calls From Bank of America Constantly, They Charged off my account in May, 2009. I have recieved a few letters from Glasser and Glasser P.L.C. in Norfolk. I just tossed them. Now I get this Letter... See tinyurl(dot)com/rasglas for a copy of it. Since this is my first post it says I can't post a link. What is it exactly, How do I deal with it. I called the FXCO Circuit Court, and was on hold forever. Is this valid? I know that it is not a summons, when would I expect to receive one? Can they just ask for a judgement against me without me having to go to court? I'm sure I have more questions, but I am at a loss right now. I just found this forum. Thank you so much for reading this, and your assistance. Rasop
Can you give them a personal visit? It seems to suggest that it's a complaint. Perhaps you have to be personally served and that will happen later. You should check your court rules. When someone doesn't answer a summons and complaint if that is required, a plaintiff will often seek a default judgment. It's important that you get your court's rules, since rules in different courts are different.
Thank you Dumb Bob, for your answers. I am unable to get up to the courthouse at this time. I can't get in to as of why. This complaint was sent through the mail, not certified, no summons, as of yet. I need to know if there is a form Sample of and answer to a complaint. I am assumong that this has not been brought to the courts yet. I diodn't send a VL within the 30 days, is it advisable to send one now, along with the answer of a complaint. I have been searching the internet for help for hours, over the past several days. I find Many Great resources for the state of Michigan, but none for Virginia. Thanks again Raso
Obviously you can't just move there. Have you found this site?: The Official Website for the Supreme Court of Virginia
Thank you Dumb Bob. Sorry for the delayed Response. I went away for the Thanksgiving Holiday. I looked at the Sight, but was lost. Thanks again
I received a summons on this Last week. My 21 days are up December 7, 2009. The Summons Reads: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Summons-Civil Action The party upon whom this summons and the attached complaint are served is hereby notified that unless within 21 days after such service, response is made by filing in the Clerk's office of this Court a pleading in writing, in proper legal form, the allegations and charges may be taken as admitted and the court may enter an order, judgment or decree against such party either by default or after Hearing evidence. APPEARANCE IN PERSON IS NOT REQUIRED BY THIS SUMMONS. The Complaint and Answer are Posted here: tinyurl.com/glassner. I don't have enough posts to post a true link, sorry. Please take a look at it and let me know if anything is wrong, or missing? Also How do I file a Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Debt, and should it be attached with my answer. I found these Rules of civil procedure, for Virginia, But I am lost as to which rule(s) i need. I have looked at chapter 7, which is the one I think I need, but am lost as to the legal jargin. tinyurl.com/va-rules Thanks for any help or suggestions.
Those images are totally useless. Can't read a thing no matter what I do with them. I'd suggest that you set up a google docs page and see if you can't make it come out more readable that way. In Google Docs you can set the size of the displayed image and that should make it readable if you set your scanner properties correctly.
Thanks cap1sucks, I think I figured out the Google Docs thing. Please let me know. Here is the new link. tinyurl.com/raso1
They were just JPG files which show up fine for Dumb Bob right in the web browser. Downloading and viewing with external JPG software also worked fine for Dumb Bob. The Google Docs version seems fine too.
Thanks Dumb Bob, They worked fine for me also. But I guess if you use a different browser, they might not show up good. No suggestions, on the content of this thread?
Is that how they do captions in Virginia? Check the rules, and other lawsuits. If you can't get to your courthouse, you might be able to look them up online and pay to have them copy some of it. But often you can look at what you were sent. What does it look like? Appearance: tells all parties you are in the suit and require service of all documents. Answer: Your response to Complaint to avoid Default Judgment. Motion: A request for the court to do something specific. Often the Appearance and Answer are filed with the court and served to the Plaintiff together. This isn't usually required although not filing an Answer means the Plaintiff can still at least try for a Default, although you should hear about it since you'd have appeared. In the sorts of cases that are often discussed around here, that's the usual thing to happen, the Default, Dumb Bob means. With a motion, you could make the other side drive in for a court hearing that they otherwise would not be attending. This is the sort of thing that lawyers try to charge for so it makes sense to make as sure as you can be that your arguments are correct or at least reasonable. That doesn't mean don't file motions, it means make sure you do it right. This appears to be the state laws of Virginia, not its court rules. The laws are very important, of course, but the day to day nuts and bolts of court room action are usually mostly decided by the court using its rules and its case law. There are places where the state's legislature will overrule the courts, so certainly you should read the laws on civil procedure too. In fact, partly why it seems so disjointed is that it is just overruling the courts on this or that seemingly random thing.
Personally, I dislike affirmative defenses because by definition they admit that certain allegations of the plaintiff are true but argue that there are mitigating circumstances. In your case you didn't specify which of the plaintiff's allegations are true or what your affirmative defenses actually are. A list of what they might be don't cut it. So in net effect what you did was to try to deny everything and call your denials an affirmative defense. That's a very common mistake. I've even seen practicing attorneys make that same mistake. But that is water over the dam now so I wouldn't worry that much. You can amend your response later if necessary. But where is the affidavit you speak of. That affidavit may very well turn out to be the most important document of all. Once you have posted the affidavit please give us editorial privileges through the share options so I can post some comments on it instead of having to try to bring them back here all the time. Copy and paste from an image don't work well if at all. While FIA card services may be a subsidiary corporation of Bank of America you must be careful about how you list their address because if you try to sue them for whatever reason (maybe providing a false affidavit) and you serve the summons on Bank of America you will suddenly find yourself embroiled in a morass of problems as they attempt to squirm out of it by claiming you served them at the wrong address. Since the vast majority of affidavits rendered by attorneys are false and fraudulent you probably have about an 80 to 90 percent chance that yours is too. Even if it is false and fraudulent that may not help you in local court because the judge can skirt the issue for them if s/he chooses to do so. I've seen judges do that too. About all they have to do is rule that the affidavit is not allowable as evidence and proceed with the case and you lose no matter what they did wrong. Take the matter to federal court and sue them for providing false and misleading information to a consumer among other things and you will quickly find out how well they like using such affidavits then or in the future. (LOL) They don't need the affidavit to win in the first place. It just makes their case look better. Like putting lipstick on a pig. Don't change the fact that it is still a pig.
Dumb Bob, Thank you for your Response. I appreciate it very much. Yes, I took it from the one that they sent me.
The Affidavit is 4-Complaint, Marked Exibit B on the Google docs. it is a jpg file, as my OCR Software makes it come out messed up. I have rescaned it again and posted it with privileges here: tinyurl.com/affidavit-edit So I guess Serve the Attorneys Glasser and Glasser, and Leave out the FIA CARD Services N.A. C/O Part of what I had on my answer, Glasser and Glasser Crown Center, Suite 600 etc. Thank you very much for your response, and assistance.