/ Register

Question

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by jrjr35, Jun 23, 2002.

  1. jrjr35

    jrjr35 Well-Known Member

    I just read on this forum tonight an excerpt from a post stating that I can sue a bank that initiated a "hard" inquiry on my TU CR for one of their credit cards without my permission. It said that I could get either actual damages or $1000 which ever is greater. Is this true?
     
  2. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

    Sorry Counselor, :)

    If you have a CC with the Bank they CAN pull a report. It's when these people pull reports and you have NO account with them that you may sue for a $1,000.

    Keep the questions coming.

    :)
     
  3. jrjr35

    jrjr35 Well-Known Member

    Butch, you may have misunderstood me....i had no cc with the bank, they did the hard without my permission....when opening a checking account.
     
  4. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

    Soooo Sorry Jr,

    Was overdraft protection part of your application?

    I would venture to say that they should not be pulling CR's for JUST a checking acct, but I'd better defer to the experts.

    :)
     
  5. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

    § 604. Permissible purposes of consumer reports [15 U.S.C. § 1681b]

    (a) In general. Subject to subsection (c), any consumer reporting agency may furnish a consumer report under the following circumstances and no other:

    (1) In response to the order of a court having jurisdiction to issue such an order, or a subpoena issued in connection with proceedings before a Federal grand jury.

    (2) In accordance with the written instructions of the consumer to whom it relates.

    (3) To a person which it has reason to believe

    (A) intends to use the information in connection with a credit transaction involving the consumer on whom the information is to be furnished and involving the extension of credit to, or review or collection of an account of, the consumer; or

    (B) intends to use the information for employment purposes; or

    (C) intends to use the information in connection with the underwriting of insurance involving the consumer; or

    (D) intends to use the information in connection with a determination of the consumer's eligibility for a license or other benefit granted by a governmental instrumentality required by law to consider an applicant's financial responsibility or status; or

    (E) intends to use the information, as a potential investor or servicer, or current insurer, in connection with a valuation of, or an assessment of the credit or prepayment risks associated with, an existing credit obligation; or

    (F) otherwise has a legitimate business need for the information

    (i) in connection with a business transaction that is initiated by the consumer; or

    (ii) to review an account to determine whether the consumer continues to meet the terms of the account.
     
  6. jrjr35

    jrjr35 Well-Known Member

    no over draft either....the personal banker kept pushing the credit card and i said i'd think about it...the denial letter i received in the mail was specifically for a credit card.
     
  7. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

    You got em, IMHO-lol


    A permissable purpose must be for the extension of credit. A checking acct obviously does not qualify because you deposit the funds first and that's NOT credit.

    That's my take. You'll get more answers tomorrow


    :)
     
  8. KCPaul

    KCPaul Well-Known Member

    Denial letter - they better have an application for credit that you have signed. That may be the catch you are looking for!
     
  9. jrjr35

    jrjr35 Well-Known Member

    Ok here's the scoop. I called today and spoke with the bank manager and we went round and round about this. The personal banker is telling her that i verbally authorized her to initiate the application for the card, which is a bald face lie!!!!!then she tells me that they are not required to obtain written permission. again i questioned whether that was true. To make a long story short I explained that the statue governing this under federal law stated that I had the right to sue for either actual damages or $1000 which ever is greater....her response? and I quote " I'm not just going to hand you over $1000 that's just not going to happen" I responded by telling her that maybe a judge would..and ended the call...I'm really not looking for huge sums of money but a more understanding manager and a more truthful employee would have went a long way in settling this. I don't like the fact that this personal banker may get fired over this..BUT I also don't like it when someone is making me out to be the liar....any suggestions would be appreciated.
     
  10. charlieslex

    charlieslex Well-Known Member

    You can tell them that they have til the 1st to get it deleted from your CR's or a judge WILL decide, and you want a copy of the UDF. That gives them an out. Charlie
     

Share This Page