weird situation, please help!

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by desperate, Aug 20, 2002.

  1. LKH

    LKH Well-Known Member

    They made a mistake which you were completely aware of. They may be 2% liable. You are 98%. I'm sorry, but if they chose to pursue this, I think it would be slam dunk on your intent to defraud. You had better do as suggested and speak to a lawyer. When they show up to get the car, what are you going to say then? You've been lying to them about the whereabouts of the car which goes to prove more intent. You would much better of being straight with them. Good luck, you're going to need it.
     
  2. mitchra

    mitchra Well-Known Member

    I am telling you, when they show up and can not find the car, they are going to hire a repo-guy and he is going to begin skiptracing to locate the vehicle. They will call you constantly asking where the car is. Drive by your house in the wee hours of the morning, etc... When the repo guy finally finds it, he is going to repo no matter where it is. If you tell TranSouth what you did they are going to freak. You will be responsible for the repo expenses as well.

    The problem with keeping the loan up is that you also have a requirement under the original contract to insure the vehicle during the term of the contract. By failing to meet your terms under the contract, you give TranSouth the right to accelerate all payments, and demand the entire loan balance in full now. If you were to pay the entire loan right now, then your problem is solved. TranSouth's claim to the vehicle is gone, and you are done. If you don't abide by all the contract provisions then the loan becomes immediately payable in full. I think you will also find that there is a provision in the original sales contract that you will not encumber the vehicle with other liens or sell the vehicle etc...

    TranSouth has absolutely no culpability in sending you the title. That does not constitute fraud or a criminal act. It's the same situation as if your employer accidentally EFT'd your account for $10,000 instead of $1,000 for you paycheck. You can't just keep the additional $9,000 and go out and spend it all. You have to return the extra money to your employer. In your case you should have either kept the title safe, or returned it to them.

    The best thing to do, if you had available funds, would be to call TranSouth, find out the entire loan balance, and pay it immediately. Once this is done, they can no longer attempt reposession, because they no longer have an interest in the vehicle, and you are free and clear. Consider taking out a loan using the new car as collateral, using a credit cards, borrowing from a family member - anything to pay this loan off before they begin repo.
     
  3. jrjr35

    jrjr35 Well-Known Member


    On the contrary, By making payments, she demonstrates that she knew she did not hold free title to the car. You cannot sell liened property without paying off the lien. The judge will ask her why she took the title, and used it as a trade in for another car when she knew that she did not own the vehicle outright, which is why she continues to make payments. I'm not here to judge you, so GOOD LUCK!
     
  4. mitchra

    mitchra Well-Known Member

    Good point, I know the way my insurance works- all I have to do to add a vehicle to my policy is call in and give them the VIN number and year and make of the car, color etc... They don't come out and inspect the car or anything like that. I don't know what they do in the background. I was thinking if she just got it on her policy, then she would be OK. Obviously, if she ever tried to file a claim, then the insurance company would want to see the car etc and she would be busted. The thing is, she could never file a claim, and hopefully she wouldn't - that would be fraud. As far as the state DMV pulling a red flag because the car is insured twice is a long shot in my opinion. The State DMV's probably do not communicate with the insurance companies directly. Ie they would not notify her insurance company that the car in question is insured by another motorist - what would be the states motivtion to do this?

    I did have a friend who sold his car and did not purchase a new car as he was moving to New York, and figured he didn't need a car anymore. Upon learning that if he did decide to buy a car that his insurance rates would skyrocket because he did not maintain "continuous coverage", he simply kept his insuarnce on the car he sold open and continued paying it. That way, he figured, if he did decide to buy a new car in New York, he could prove he had continuous coverage.

    I think now that her best route is to simply pay off the loan and be done with it.

    I do not claim to be knowledgable about the ins and outs of insurance though. Maybe an insurance professional could comment on the insurance question.
     
  5. iamsamiam

    iamsamiam Well-Known Member

    I really feel for you, this is a fairly serious crime you have committed. I am not going to say anything bad to. Hell, I have had moments when an idea seemed brilliant, luckily I stopped myself in time. I think the only thing that would be of help to you in this situation is that you continued to make payments.

    There is no getting around it, this is out and out fraud. They may have made a mistake in sending you the title but that certainly gave you no right to do what you did. I wouldn't worry about the civil suit at all, it will be criminal charges that get you. Thing of the ramifications of this, please. Whoever has this car now may end up getting it taken from them.

    I am sorry this has happened to you, but to put any blame at all off on Transouth is not accepting responsibilty for what you have done. I would get myself an attorney asap, you are certainly going to need one. I hope you have a sympathetic judge. If you get an attorney now, perhaps they can make a deal with Transouth so you may avoid prosecution.
     
  6. ohnostuck

    ohnostuck Well-Known Member

    OK, this is my take on this whole thing. This is NOT a credit related situation. What you did was FRAUD., plain and simple. You knew exactly what you were doing. This is not a case where someone loses a job and falls behind on car payments. This was fraud and there may be no debtors prisons but there are plenty for people like this. Another thing that speaks a THOUSAND words about you is putting it (on purpose) in your husbands name. SHAME ON YOU.

    Again, you knew what you were doing, and you need to face that. Responding to this post as "funny" does not sit well with me.
     
  7. desperate

    desperate Member

    My plan was never to committ fraud, although this is what it seems that I have done.

    I must remind everyone that yes they have a security intrest in the car but.....They do not have a title to anything.

    Their collections at this point seems to think they do since I haven't told them otherwise.

    The first lemon car was given back to the dealership with TranSouth's knowledge and the title was forwarded to the dealership and sold apparently to someone down south. They of course have an security intrest in the car but have no title to reposess the car .

    The second car which I "Fraudulently" traded in I had the title for and gave that to the trade in dealership (Different dealership then first), they have also sold this car it appears at auction.

    Therefore when TranSouth does find out they don't have any title to any vehicle to repo they aren't going to be happy. They will probably call me at that point to ask where it is.

    I'm sure before they repo a car they must make certian all paperwork is present, including a title to repo a car with. No title and of course no repo, this means a definate civil suit and possible criminal charges if they can prove them.

    Again I will continue to pay on the loan, I can't see how paying and staying current can be a bad thing.

    I did do a check on criminal law in my state and there is something there about selling or transfering secured property, it is a misdemeanor 2 grading.

    I have no means to pay the car off. I have no credit cards and our credit is too bad to even get a personal loan without a very good cosigner.

    I will speak to my lawyer and do the best I can to explain the situation. Again I never set out to defraud anyone, if they want the other car we have the title for I will definetly offer it to them. The car is a 2001 Old Alero worth about $12995.00 I owe about $14900.00 on the auto loan with TranSouth.

    Thanks for the replies though!

    Desperate
     
  8. mitchra

    mitchra Well-Known Member

    Please note that I am not brandishing you for commiting fraud. I am only apprising you of your situatoin. It is not mine to judge. I think concievably, TranSouth could obtain a new title for the vehicle from the DMV. They would simply have to prove to the DMV that they have a PMSI in the vehicle, then the DMV would issue them a new title. You could concievably not only wind up charged with fraud, but Grand Theft Auto as well which is a felony in most states. If you can not take out a loan to repay the balance owed TranSouth, one last option would be to call them and ask them to transfer the loan balance to the Olds. You would have to send them the title to the Olds and create a new contract transferring the loan from the Ford to the Olds. This would be solely at their option, and they may decline which would leave you holding the bag.

    I am curious though, how you have an attorney if you are "broke". I went to see an attorney about a month ago and he charged $250 per hour with a $1000.00 retainer up front. Cost me $20 just to have a thirty minute conversation with him to determine if he would even take my case. Attorney's aren't cheap.
     
  9. breeze

    breeze Well-Known Member

    Ummmmm, I am an insurance professional. :)

     
  10. mitchra

    mitchra Well-Known Member

    Oops, sorry Breeze.

    Could you explain how the insurance company would know whether or not you own the car when you add it to your policy. Do they check state registration databases, look into their magic crystal ball, or read the chicken bones? lol.

    It would be interesting to know the inside scoop on their controls.

    I know they do some checking if you file a claim, but what do they do when you add a vehicle to your policy?
     
  11. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

    Never pay an atty. to see if he will entertain your case, not even $20. lol


    Desperate, just so you know I rather doubt that criminal charges will be forthcoming. But you WILL need a lawyer to work out a deal with the creditor. The law would become involved only if the creditor wants to. It's your atty's. job to make them not want to. Obviously you must act quickly.

    They already know that if you're in jail they won't get a penny.

    lol
     
  12. mitchra

    mitchra Well-Known Member

    I used a referral service - Finding attorney's in my area specializing in consumer law (FCRA, FDCPA) is not easy. There are thousands specializing in personal injury, but consumer attorney's are fairly rare. Infact, the referral service only listed the one guy I met with. I tried e-mailing Swzak, and never got a response back. Believe me, I wouldn't pay unless I had to...
     
  13. Dani

    Dani Well-Known Member

    I will keep my self righteous opinion to myself, but I believe this can be attributed to a very important lesson:

    Don't buy a Ford. ;)

    Dani
     
  14. mitchra

    mitchra Well-Known Member

    Or GM for that matter. You can't go wrong with a Toyota...
     
  15. mitchra

    mitchra Well-Known Member

    I agree with your point here Butch. It is not likely that any criminal charges will be pressed, especially if she is willing to pay. But these are all real possibilities that should be considered, and drive home the point of how critical it is that she take action immediately. Further, I think it is strange that TranSouth is pursuing repossession when she is current on her loan. This indicates that they are looking to get the car back for whatever reason.

    They should be obtaining insurance to cover the vehicle on her behalf and pushing the charges back to her. This used to be a relatively common practice when individuals failed to properly insure their vehicles, especially in the sub-prime markets. The dealer or financeer would obtain outrageously high insurance policies and charge the insurance premiums back to the buyer. The the buyer would then default, and they would be resposible for the loan balance and insurance and any incidental expenses. The dealer - usually a tote your note place would simply turn the cars over and resell them to the next poor slob and start the process all over again. A real scam.
     
  16. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

    You're right on Mitch.

    :)
     
  17. Zocrates

    Zocrates Member

    You need to contact a lawyer immediatley. You've got to stop telling lies.
     
  18. sassyinaz

    sassyinaz Well-Known Member

    I understood it was illegal to obtain insurance on a car that was not titled to you. I wonder how whoever ended up with your car has it insured? just curious.

    I, for one, wouldn't have had the kahunas to do what you did, desperate, though I understand that desperation in having already been bent over and taken it up the rear, twice for you.

    No one was willing to do the right thing by you and your Ford lemons -- I'm impressed you tried to turn the tables and get the ball back into your court as a consumer.

    How many of us have ever bought a car without getting screwed? How many of us have ever had a car financed without getting further screwed? How many of us have ever been able to get out of an auto contract once having realized the full extent of the screwing?

    The fact is, car dealers are allowed to lie, they make their money lying, ultimately all that matters is what is on that piece of paper you signed, no matter who misrepresented what to whom. The dealers can in reality breach their contracts and have recourse -- we however cannot.

    I applaud your efforts, desperate, to level the playing field and look out for yourself -- I'm impressed you are still making payments on the car as well. That said, the reality is that the levelling has consequences for you, and serious ones! My fellow netters have given you the benefit of their collective wisdom and sincere advice, spot on I say.

    You are obviously intelligent and clever, if not shrewd ;-), that's not a bad thing in my book. In the scenario you've described, you will likely be accountable for your shrewdness whereas the dealer and manufactor faces no practical consequences.

    Car dealers violate every consumer protection law there is to violate, when they figure out how to get around those they make up new ones -- they should do the right thing to begin with. They wouldn't have such a bad reputation and stories like yours wouldn't exist.

    You've heard two wrongs don't make a right, yes? In your case, three wrongs don't make a right either. Unfortunately, it's more likely you will be the one bearing the burden. Like I said, I wouldn't have had the kahunas to do what you did, I'm not judging you, I do applaude your attempts to make a wrong right! Now, do the smart thing and see an attorney, one at least as clever and intelligent as you are. The fact is, you have too much to loose and you don't have a mega-bucks dealership or insurance company with dollars to throw at lawsuits!

    A consumer advocate attorney should be able to argue that you were obtaining vigilante protection for your hard-earned money and big investment -- the right way, however, is to pursue those avenues via the consumer laws and legal system -- perhaps a jury would be sympathetic as well, we've all been in those taking it up the butt spots, especially where cars are concerned.

    Watch what you say on message boards, you've definately incriminated yourself here, in my humble opinion -- the internet isn't truly anonymous; what we say and do usually does come back around to haunt us.

    This board has QQ!

    Good luck to you, desperate!

    Sassy
     
  19. Turtle

    Turtle Well-Known Member

    I know this is sort of besides-the-point, but I just thought of something. Even if there was an option for her to re-insure the car, don't all financed cars require collision insurance which requires an inspection by the insurance company beforehand?

    I know that I have insured free and clear junkers for liability insurance only by just calling up XYZ insurance and starting a policy, but when I insured my financed cars I had to have them inspected for pre-existing damage by the insurance company. I can't see how she could get around that even if re-insurance was an option.

    Anyway, I can see where Desperate is coming from. I think that if I had been given a good chance to screw over my finance companies (Household and Americredit) I would go for it. I say turnabout is fair play. BUT, before you grab a too-good-to-be-true opportunity you have to check and double check to be sure that you won't be liable later.

    Unfortunately, Desperate, I think that you acted much too quickly and left yourself wide open to civil & criminal penalties. I wish you luck with this since this mess is only going to get messier until you go to court.
     
  20. desperate

    desperate Member

    Thanks for the replies..

    My brother-in-law is an attorney, thus he isn't charging us to do this. I talked to him today and he said he would contact them and make arrangements to handle this situation.

    He looked over all of the contracts and he said criminal charges are not likely in this matter, but he said it is a small possibility.

    Along with the contract I also signed an agreement between TranSouth and myself which states that any breach or default of the contract leaves the parties in arbitration unless the sum is under $5000.00 then small claims is allowed.

    He said I signed a civil contract and breached such, he stated it is a civil matter and if it can't be handled between them and me, they would have to go to arbitration tor resolve the matter.

    Even though I traded in the newer car I had not signed any contract or agreement for that particular vehicle. It was their responsibility once I and the dealership contacted them to modify or send a new contract to be signed stipulating the newer vehicle as collateral for the loan. This does not mean they do not have a security intrest in the car but it makes them harder to enforce such since they didn't go about protecting the assest properly.

    In either case he is gonna contact them and see what he can do. He stated in PA and person who is broke has nothing to lose and deadbeats in PA are pretty well protected against judgements if they really don't own anything. PA is not a community property state and as he said we are covered under something called Homestead laws??? He also said they couldn't garnish wages from a judgement.

    He stated it would be in their best intrest to want to work something out and have me continue to pay.

    I'll let everyone know how this works out.

    Thanks again!

    Desperate
     

Share This Page