Should I Sue or Let it Go??

OK....I posted a few weeks ago about EMCC, Inc. Well, the investigation with EQ is over and the item was removed because they didn't respond. However, a few weeks ago they pulled an inquiry on my TU report. The notation shows PERMISSIBLE PURPOSE. I gave them no authorization to pull my report and am livid that they did this. The account is NOT reported on TU and they had no reason to pull a report there. Although the item was removed from EQ, should I sue for the inquiry pull with TU or just let it go and be grateful that it went away (for now)??
If I sue, any clues on where to begin (what violation to sue for, amount to sue for, etc).

TIA

LB

 

That's the thing. To make a long story short,

1) I noticed in March of this year that they had reported this tradeline
2) I sent a validation letter to them
3) I disputed with TU
4) After no response from the validation letter, I sent the estoppel
5) The tradeline was removed. Not sure if it was because of estoppel letter or because they didn't respond to the investigation
6) Fast forward to November. The tradeline is back. This time on EQ.
7) I disputed with EQ
8) I faxed EMCC an intent-to-sue letter. They ignore me
9) Today, the tradeline is removed because they didn't respond to the investigation.

Somewhere in this mix, do you think that had cause to pull my TU report? If not, what should I do from here?

Thanks in advance.

-LB

 

They haven't bought the account. They're a CA for Gateway so I don't think that they "hold" the acct. I think I'll just leave well enough alone and accept my deletion with a smile.

-LB

 

That's exactly what I thought.....I'm confused.

-LB