2 TradeLines for 1 acct is it legal

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by RobynRocks, Apr 21, 2004.

  1. RobynRocks

    RobynRocks Member

    Hi...

    I thought I read in one or two fo the strings that it is a violation to have 2 tradelines for the one account?
    Is that accurate? And if so, which law/code is that?

    DOes this situation fit this violation??:

    Have a listing from Providian that was just charged off and another lisitng by Arrow Financial Service for the account. listing it as collection

    Thanks in advance for your help with this one!!

    -Robyn
     
  2. hiding90

    hiding90 Banned

    In THIS scenerio..it is LEGAL....sorry :(
     
  3. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    DOes this situation fit this violation??:Not if the Providian listing shows a 0 balance.
     
  4. hiding90

    hiding90 Banned

    Yes.. I AM A MORON :)
     
  5. hiding90

    hiding90 Banned

    Re: Re: 2 TradeLines for 1 acct is it legal

    I agree.
     
  6. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: 2 TradeLines for 1 acct is it legal

    MORE ON WHAT?
    lol
     
  7. hiding90

    hiding90 Banned

    Re: Re: 2 TradeLines for 1 acct is it legal

    X ACT LEE
     
  8. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: 2 TradeLines for 1 acct is it legal

    LOL
     
  9. jam237

    jam237 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: 2 TradeLines for 1 acct is it legal

    You need to keep in mind however, that if Providian is showing a balance, its only a non-sueable violation, until you ask that they verify the trade line, and as long as they report a zero balance then, it is in compliance.

    With a data furnisher only half of the time when they report information can you actually sue them for it, that is only when you actually force them to update by disputing the trade line through the credit reporting agency. Any other time that they report, it isn't actionable by you, but the Federal Trade Commission or state AG's office could take action on your behalf (if there are enough consumers in similar circumstances to warrant it)
     
  10. MED

    MED Member

    I believe I have a similar problem w/ Providian Bankcorp.
    From TU:
    Providian
    Opened: 8/2000
    Closed: 9/2001
    Updated: 10/2002
    Balance: $799
    Status as of 10/02: Charged off as bad debt

    Unifund CCR Partners
    (same acct # as Providian is listed)
    Opened: 12/2002
    Closed: 10/2003
    Updated: 02/2004
    Balance: $921
    Most Owed: $799
    Status as of 02/04: Collection Acct
    (listed as Open Acct/Factoring Company Account)

    Equifax shows different dates but does appear to indicated they charged off in 09/01. The Experian report (from 7/03) does not show the Unifund at all but does show Providian w/ similar info as TU.

    The apparent problem to me is the aging of the Unifund. It appears to me that Unifund re-aged the account. I do not know if Unifund is a "purchaser" or was "assigned".

    Possible violations:
    - Unifund listed as open acct?
    - Unifund has wrong Open/Closed date?
    - Unifund shows higher balance than Providian?
     
  11. RobynRocks

    RobynRocks Member

    Okay let me give a little more info on this one.
    Experian Says:

    1. Providian DO 5/1999, Rep Since 5/1999
    Date Status:5/2002 Last report 11/2002
    balance: $602 (which is actually inaccurate, it is $58)
    acct charged off/past due 150 days $602 written off
    creditor's statement: acct closed at credit grantor's request.

    I actually closed this account to stop fianance charge and had a final pay that they did not cash (???)

    2. Arrow Financial DO 12/2002 Rep SInce 11/2001
    Date Status: 11/2001 Last Report 2/2003
    balance: $764 (????????????????) collection acct

    TU says:

    1. Providian: Closed by credit Grantor
    Opened: 5/1999, Updated 5/2002 most owed $772, 120 days late

    2. Arrow is REMOVED!!!

    EQ says:

    1. Providian DO 5/1999 Balance: $602 reported 11/2002 balance $213 status: Charge-Off


    2. Arrow Balance Owed $668 Bal Date 5/2003 date of last act 11/2001

    Okay advice advice advice.. I want to try and get the original $58 paid AND go for the removal.. thoughts, comments.. HIDING90.. if you don't have anything positive to say, then just skip this one okay? THANKS!!
    -Robyn
     

Share This Page