So far so good... I filed for a non PP about a month and a half ago. So far we have been through the other side's attorney hitting me with a motion to transfer venue, and the WHOLE gamut of discovery (requests for production, request for admissions, requests for disclosure, and interrogatories). She was trying to run me off. If you decide to go pro se you can expect that to happen to you as well. But....Not me. I'm in for the long hall. I answered her motions with my own, answered her discovery requests (actually most were objected to due to work product exemptions and that they had no relevance to the cause of action). Then she got my requests for discovery--the whole ball of wax. She has 10 more days to get me her answer or I'll move to preclude the information that could have been found in discovery and as for summary judgement. That would be a bitch for a young lawyer to get beat on procedure There are strong indications that the defendant is going to get slammed on thier motion to transfer venue. If this happens next month then I would bet they will try to start whispering settlements in my ear. They would have to send thier lawyer 400 miles away to come to the trial. Not cost efficient in a 2500 buck lawsuit But....if they want to go balls to the wall I've got them nailed--got my case precedents, state statutes, FTC staff opinions, etc. I think that this week I'm going to give them something else to think of. I think I'll subpoena the records from the CRA that they pulled the report from. I bet there is ALL KINDS of interesting things in there as to the reason they provided for pulling my report.....hehehehe Folks are winning, but you need to have your stuff together, know the law, and know the local and state procedures to follow for your case. Its a lot of work, but hey, I look at it as getting my feet wet for my future lawsuit agains TU in federal court.
I did the same thing Rhondaben did, only I'm the one that buried THEM with Interrogatories and Motions. Sears paid me the $1000 for the non-PP pull.
