Does anyone here have had good eperience having their specific credit problem handled by an attorney or consultant? I have a CA with first Dunning and there are some technical issues that I are involved but it is now time to deal with it before the 30 day period ends and my credit gets whacked. Any help appreciated. I can provide my email address if needed. I have called one attorney in the consumer area and he was not very helpful nor did he seem to know the codes or propably not comment on them at all. ski
Your first key action to preserve your rights is to dispute the debt, in writing, sent CRRR within 30 days of your receipt of their letter, demanding validation of the debt. You want this to be timely, whether you plan on using an attorney or not, and if finding an attorney and having him dispute for you were to delay your dispute, you might be wise to first get your dispute sent now, so that they may not assume the debt is valid. Your dispute can be a simple as "I dispute this debt and request that you send me validation from the original creditor." The amount they are collecting on could be wrong for a number of reasons: Not your account, they have misidentified you as the debtor. Fraudulent account, you never opened this account, and someone fraudulently opened it in your name. Erroneous amount. Your payments were not properly credited. You settled in full for some lesser amount and they are collecting on the balance contrary to your agreement. They have added fees not allowed by the contract. Etc. The amount is past SOL, and may or may not have been due, but it would be illegal for them to attempt to collect in court. You might also ask for all information you need to determine whether the debt is actually yours, and that the amount is correct, including correct accounting for any amounts paid, any allowed fees, etc. This usually includes the name and address of the original creditor, the date of last payment and the date and amount of the original delinquency, statements to support the current amount due, etc. If fees have been added, the original contract authorizing those fees would be appropriate. If you doubt the debt is even yours, you might want statements or copy of original application that would show the billing address of the debtor, which you could use to refute that you are the debtor, or support that the account is fraudulent. If the account is not yours, and was opened fraudulently, you will have to file a police report to preserve your rights and have the CRAs remove the fraudulent account TL. I would not trust a consultant to do this, and as with all professionals, the key is to pick a competent one. I am not an attorney, nor do I perform any such services for others.
Good Points ON-Trac got alot of them from you and others here And sent an EASY going letter to the CA but 1. Disputed 2. Pls Verify 3. Pls Validate 4. Pls send me address, name of Original Creditor 5. And actual amounts owed>ie accting I have gotten that off in the mail within 8 days of getting the Dunning letter. I checked my credit already and nothing there yet > thank goodness I now have 33 days minus 8 days = 25 days to find someone who can knock the socks off the CA. They have already made 2-5 violations 1. Dunning Letter not quite right 2. They are calling me at one of my cell phones but I know all the numbers of people that call me. Its the CA. 3. Original Creditor contacted me AFTER ACCOUNT was placed with CA. The fax he sent is 4 letter in nature and has his BIZ name on it. 4. Got called by someone posing as a detective wanting SSN, bank acct verification> that is for sure the CA. 5. I am now waiting for the 5 th violation in a written letter to me telling me PAY PAY PAY or ELSE ELSE ELSE...... Any comments pls jump in. SKI
Also consider what you are trying to achieve by negotiating or litigating, and what the end-game is, should you not otherwise reach agreement. Your position is strongest if it's not your debt, or if the debt is past SOL, and past the CRA reporting period, and their actions are blatantly illegal. In that case, you want them on notice that the debt and its reporting is disputed, and you want to document all illegal actions, and all damages, to use in legal action. You also want to push toward a resolution since the passage of time increases damage to you, and court awards seldom add up to your real economic costs. Don't leave out regulatory and BBB complaints to add additional documentation that they were aware of but continued illegal actions. If some amount of the debt may be valid and collectible thru the courts if they sue, you will have to weigh your leverage based on their FDCPA violations against their economic incentives to sue, if they might be able to prove the debt is valid. If they have added extra fees, or are collecting on some account that they have no way or intention to validate, they are counting on it costing you too much even to defend yourself, and the fact that most consumers don't even know their rights, and most suits to collect end in default judgements. If the OC is still in the picture, and the CA is acting on an account assigned by the OC, does the OC's amount due agree with the CA's?