Re: Re: Re: Re: bounced check validation ok this is silly.. and I really don't have any experience with this - but my first thought is... How on earth is a copy of a check (even with an NSF stamp) proof of anything other than you bounced a check? Wow, guess I could be in for future problems I guess. I have bounced a check with my local grocery store...and when they called, I came in and paid cash. They gave me the original check back... but I am sure they have a copy of it. The only proof I have that I paid it is.... nothing.
Re: Re: Re: Re: bounced check validation 1*How on earth is a copy of a check (even with an NSF stamp) proof of anything other than you bounced a check? 2*They gave me the original check back... but I am sure they have a copy of it. 3*The only proof I have that I paid it is.... nothing. Peri ========== 1*It's not. 2*This is one reason why you should not pay on a photo copy. 3*Another excellent reason not to make good on photo copies. THE END ** *** ** LB 59 """"```--~~~~~~~~~--```'""'''
Re: Re: Re: Re: bounced check validation You have the right to EXAMINE the original check. If a lawsuit is filed then you serve a subpoena to EXAMINE the original check and make a copy. My original post said don't expect to RECEIVE the original check. The original check would show up in a court as evidence.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: bounced check validation In other words you have to get sued before you have a right to the check.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: bounced check validation NO "ORIGINAL" CHECK---DON'T PAY!!! IT IS NOT EVIDENCE AFTER YOU PAY!!! "JUDGE...I WILL PAY IN FULL...CONDITIONAL ON THE RELEASE OF THE ORIGINAL CHECK TO ME---NO ORIGINAL CHECK...I CAN'T PAY"
George is correct that you should insist on the ORIGINAL check. It's a moot point since the SOL has expired. It's just not realistic to expect receiving the original check without payment.
