Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Capital One fraud affidavit That would be a different board - perhaps you should start one. This one is for people who are already in trouble. They can get lectured and preached to in numerous other places. After one trip to credit hell, most people learn their lesson.
Re: Re: Capital One fraud affidavit 1*a lack of responsible financial planning. too much===== ================= 1* How does protecting myself from rip-offs con jobs and shell games reflect that I'm responsible?
Signing an affidavit with an altered signature, is an act of fraud in itself. An affidavit requires being signed before a notary. The notary witnesses that the person who wrote the affidavit, really is the person who signed the affidavit. You will be swearing to the truth of the context of the affidavit. Multiple signatures are requested to determine whether you may have signed an account application, using the very methods you described. However, multiple signatures are no advantage for the CC company. If you sign an affidavit declaring the account is not yours, and if push comes to shove, as in a civil action, then the lawyers will obtain your hand writing samples from several sources. They will also obtain other hand writing characteristics from several sources. If the cc account you are being billed for is not yours, and you have nothing to fear from an inspection of your hand writing, you can respond with your own affidavit, denying the cc is yours. The cc company will be burdened with the task of proving it is yours. One way to disprove a cc account, is to obtain statements from the cc company, showing all transactions. If you did not make those transactions (ie: transactions at places you have never been; payments from someone other than you), they have no case against you.
Capital One typically sends "fraud affidavits" out when they receive any type of dispute, even when they know that the consumer didn't allege fraud; its easier for them to go the 'fraud' route, then to try to dig up information to answer the dispute.
Of course, Kathy, you do realize that this post was all the way back in 2003? Did you want to bump it back up?