censorship on this board

I guess it was really REMOVED...I thought it might have been MOVED to the GENERAL LOUNGE...but it is NOT there...

 

What made your post stand out?

Your post had nothing to do with credit, IMO.

When you sign up, you agree to allow the site to delete your posts, so don't whine about it...

Talk about CREDIT and you will be fine I'm sure.

 

The kid must have a telepathic mind.

BTW, kid what does THIS POST have to do with credit?

The kid has earned my first "ignore".

 

censorship? sounds like whining, but whatever...

Here is what you should take from the Fisher incident:

Don't post details about your disputes that would allow one to identify you. We already have our IP addresses up here, which IMO sucks.

Instead of saying "Macy's," say "a store."

Your post intended to "call out" a particular person, and IMO, that is why it was removed (and had nothing to do with credit). If it had anything to do with credit, it was a remote connection. So what do you do? You start another thread whining about it, instead of getting a clue.

 

If this thread gets deleted, and it should IMO, I am not going to cry "Censorship!". LOL ;0)

 

Why does every post you make have to have some type of negative, insult type comment to it?

 

Hey Dumb Troll...

Compare my post in this thread to your post. I write a long post with case law cites, Senate report cites and is all that you post is " [] ". So who is the TROLL? Get a clue, dumbo...

http://consumers.creditnet.com/straighttalk/board/showthread.php?s=&pgnum=1&postid=279537#post279537

 

TROLL--

Also look at how I corrected you regarding the fdcpa in this thread. You have over 5K posts..maybe time to read the FDCPA in its entirety, dumbo troll...

http://consumers.creditnet.com/straighttalk/board/showthread.php?s=&pgnum=1&postid=279564#post279564

 

I don't know what the hell your problem is but pretty much every post I have seen from you has been nothing more than insulting and rude. I get the feeling that not many people here like you, including me so why don't you just move on ? Your username "The Kid' blantely shows your immaturity. You get a clue, Kid.

 

Wow, my first use for the ignore feature. Feel free to blast away, I won't see it =)

Gib

 

hey dumb troll...how ya doin'?

what goes around comes around, don't it?

see here where I correct the most respected posters on this board with case law and solid interpretation of statutes...then tell me who the TROLL is.

http://consumers.creditnet.com/straighttalk/board/showthread.php?s=&pgnum=1&postid=279537#post279537

So what is insulting and rude about my post in this link?? Anything??? You fools will listen to everything and anything that someone tells you..

http://consumers.creditnet.com/straighttalk/board/showthread.php?s=&pgnum=1&postid=279537#post279537

 

LOL! You are calling me dumb ? You seem to not know the definiton of Troll, the online variation. Way out of context buddy. What, will you call me Dumbo Next ? hahaha - Online iditots , always good for a laugh. But before long they come a pain in the arse and have to be squashed. Your time is coming I am sure. >:O)

 

Let's hear you talk about credit now...let's see if you can defend the 2 most respected posters, Doc and Marie on their take on permissible purpose:

http://consumers.creditnet.com/stra...9537#post279537

Let's hear you do something other than follow like a sheep...take a stand Kid.

 

See if you can defend your troll buddy in this thread.

http://consumers.creditnet.com/stra...9564#post279564

5000 posts and has not read the FDCPA.. LMAO

 

Do you think this is some battle to see who can win the most respect ,and be THE "Respected member." If you do than your a fool. Seriously the way your going about things you'll never earn anyones repsect. Your threads just seem to piss people off, and maybe thats what your hoping to accomplish. On the other hand I am no position to defend anyone, im not here to do so. 'Nor do I know a great deal about credit, thats why I am here. Um DUH?! Refrain from calling me kid , your the one who acts such, and afterall it is your username.

 

I'm here to talk about credit, you troll...

Let me give you a little advice:

Scrutinize everything that you read. Figure that 99% of the interpretations of fcra and fdcpa are "wishful thinker consumer" positions, and seldom accurate.

For example, a CRA can take longer than 30 days to investigate a dispute. You hear people talking about "Oh boy, it is 31 days and now I have a violation worth $1000.." That is the mentality that you see here, and you can watch other posters follow step who are too chicken chit to disagree.

Let's talk about credit--this is a credit site.

Don't wanna hear this whining about censorship, trols, blah blah blah...this is about credit.

 

Not quite, I have read it plenty of times. I'd like to point out, that your comments or opinions have been shot down as incorrect more times than you have been correct, by many posters. You still haven't answered the very simple question I asked you, which by the way, did not warrant your kid like outburst.

you have to have tougher skin if you want to play this credit game.

 

If you don't want to hear about trolls why do you keep calling people them ,and why do you keep trying to be such a smart @$$ ? You like to start trouble that is apparent. You sure do seem to contradict your self a alot also.