Does anyone have any idea where I might look to find information on these people.... A banking or financial institution, I cant find them anywhere... I want to find who they are so I have a better understanding of who is suing me. On credit report they list arrow financial as buying their account. But arrow is not suing me. What gives ? Any ideas? Pretty sure they are a creditor but would like to find info on who they are.
Arrow owns DAG. DAG is a partnership set up by Arrow to pruchase bad debts. When Arrow dunned you, you could have asked for that info. Now just get it in Discovery. Once you ask for it, Arrow won;t release and they may just dismiss. At least that has been my experience with them.
To ask for info in "Discovery" do I need to file that with the court or can I just send it to the Plaintiff's attorney?
I have been burrying myself in the Rules for Civil Procedure for most of late last night and this morning,but I am about to cry. I went ahead and called an attorney that I got as a reference through the state bar association, wasn't there so I left a message. I just hope he can help me.. Today I received a request for admissions. They mailed two copies, I am asumming I have to file that with the court and send one to them? They were asking questions about the original account holder, but make it look like I had just opened the account in September of 2002. On my Transunion CR it lists the account as closed in October of 2002. My last payment was in April of 2002. I understand now what people are talking about when they say "redated". By there paperwork it almost looks as though they are doing this for Providan, the account was charged off and is listed as sold on my credit report. I really appreciate everyone on this site. It has been nice to get so much info and such a better understanding of things.
Yes, you must respond to opposing counsel and file the COS with the Clerk (and any other parties). You need to serve your own discovery to see what they have by way of assignments and/or chain of ownership.
I was looking in the civil procedures and found something called "Fictitious parties" stating when a party is ignorant of the name of an opposing party that if the true name comes out that the pleedings and proceedings in the action may be amended by substituting the true name. also found an defense of" the party asserting the claim is not the real party in interest. Would any of this be at all in the right direction? Another reason I am really curious as to finding out info on DAG is that I found a law stating tht a trust account may no be used jointly as a trust account and an operating account. I am just very curious right now and wish I could find more info.
