Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by runawayjim, Aug 29, 2003.
Barclaycard Ring™ Mastercard®
No annual fee, No balance transfer fees, No foreign transaction fees, Low interest!
CREDIT CARD WITH NO ANNUAL FEEBarclaycard Ring™ Mastercard®
Credit One Unsecured Visa®for Rebuilding Credit
Credit card for people with bad credit to rebuild credit!
BAD CREDIT CREDIT CARDCredit One Bank® Rebuild Credit
First Access VISA® Credit Card
Access to credit even with bad or limited credit! Reports to 3 major credit bureaus and accepted wherever you see the Visa® sign. Get application response in 60 seconds.
CREDIT CARD FOR BAD CREDITFirst Access VISA®
Green Dot primor® Visa®Classic Secured Credit Card
Credit lines available up to $5,000! Reports to three national credit bureaus; perfect card for reestablishing credit. Guaranteed approval*!
SECURED CARD FOR REBUILDING CREDITprimor Secured Visa Classic
Credit One Bank® Unsecured Visa® with Cash Back Rewards
Get cash back on every purchase. Unsecured credit card with monthly monitoring for credit line increases. Improve your credit history with responsible use.
CASH BACK UNSECURED VISACredit One Bank
Dangerious to send CRA Reports?
runawayjim Wants to know
Furnishers pay to report to the CRA's. That's why you may see a TL on none, one, two, or all 3 reports.
I'm no expert on this subject, but I don't think it would be a good idea to do this for a couple of reasons:
1. It probably wouldnt make any difference...the CRAs report what they want to report. They dont hardly look at (much less use) consumer-furnished 'evidence' that a TL should be reported a certain way. They don't even use DF supplied PROOF half the time.
2. It could be used against you in some way, or an unscrupulous person could get a hold of your personal info.
When i had a TL that came off 2 of the 3 CRAs, I simply mentioned that fact (over and over) in the many letters I sent to the 1 CRA holdout.
someone with more knowledge might say something different tho.
Yeah, I have the same fear that it could be used irresponsably. But your point that they wouldn't consider something sent in by a consumer makes it not worth even considering. Thanks for the input. And thanks for the bump lbrown!