Do I need to pay late fees when original charge itselfis reversed

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by vsthakur1, May 15, 2008.

  1. vsthakur1

    vsthakur1 New Member

    Hi,
    I am not sure, if it is a correct platform to raise

    the question .But anyway ...,

    In Nov 2007, I bought an item from a company which

    sells the product online.They offered a credit card

    alongwith the item and asked me to pay through the

    credit card.
    In the following days, I neither received the item

    nor the credit card. I did not follow it up myself

    and almost forgotten it.
    Now, two weeks back , I got a phone call from the

    credit card company that I had to pay certain amount

    ( cost of the item + fees for non payment).
    I contacted the company help desk.They confirmed that

    the item returned to their warehouse ,

    undelivered.So, they are going to request the credit

    card company to reverse the charge.

    The credit card company reversed the original charge

    but they are still insisting that I should pay the

    late fees charges.My point is - I do not enjoy any

    benefit from the deal, as I never received

    it.Moreover, the original charge itself has been

    nullified.
    Do I need to pay the late fees and other charges of

    non payment even if the original charge itself is

    revoked ? If no, then what are the options available

    to me ?
    I really appreciate your advice in this matter.
    Thanks,
    Vijay
     
  2. jlynn

    jlynn Well-Known Member

    You need to do an FCBA dispute to the credit card company.
     
  3. apexcrsrv

    apexcrsrv Well-Known Member

    Yes, that is exactly what you need to do in order to prevent this from appearing on your credit reports.
     

Share This Page