Hello, I believe EX is blowing smoke, but the question is how to proceed. I disputed an old cingular bill 2 months ago. I did not send a validation letter to the CA. After 30 days it came back as "updated". I then decided I would send a validation request to CA and redispute the item with EX. The first dispute was listed as required by law as "in dispute" on my CR, however the second dispute was never listed on my CR as "in dispute". Can I use this as leverage with EXP since they did break the law by not listing the item as "in dispute"? I suspected that EXP was not investigating jack when the item was not listed as "in dispute" and I also suspected that they would was ~ 30 days and send me an email saying that the item had been "updated". Well today I got notice that the item was suposedly "Updated" by EXP. My question is now what. Do I send a procedurial request to EXP, do I send a ITS to the CA for verifiying but not validating? Is that a violation? What do I do now???
1*. Do I send a procedural request to EXP, 2* do I send an ITS to the CA for verifying but not validating? 3*Is that a violation? 4*What do I do now??? dnaone111 -------------------------- 1--Yes 2--Have you sent the CA the estoppel? 3-- Sounds like it. 4--Send ITS To CRA THE END ** *** ** LB 59 """""""""```~~~```'"""""""""
