I have filed a complaint against a CA for attempting collection on me without the required license or bond for AZ Also their coporate charter was revoked and they need to file certain corporate, partnership or other organizational documents with the state of AZ banking Dept to be able to do BIZ in the AZ as a CA. I have posted here about this CA and problem. Thanks FOLKS for the posts and help That means you IDARE!!! So I was woundering if anyone has filed complaints with their AGs??> 1. Does the AGs office actually get to the complaint in a timely manner? 2. Anyone here done this in AZ> whats your experience? 3. What do they do to the CA> anyone know or have a completion of a complaint to AG??? Also thoughts on the "false representation" of the CA which seems also to be in violation of FDCPA. The reason I ask the above is that there are many CAs illegally operating and is it that the states AG office just cannot track them down and bring them to task quickly??? If it takes 6 months for the AG to get to that illegal CA well by that time they can easily move!! And by that time the account is reported and you are fighting the battle now also with the CRA. I think this is interesting because if you can somehow bring the CA and OC to court somehow and circumvent this silliness then maybe that is the quickest strategy> ANY thoughts?? Use Small Claims Court?? Thoughts????? SKI
Did you draw your line in the sand? Did you notify the CA, in writing, that the debt was invalid, and send copies of your settlement offer and the processed check? If not, you defeat the whole purpose of making such an offer. The purpose of written agreements is to move disputes from "he said this, but he said that", to "This is what they apparently put in writing as their agreement", and was the written agreement followed. You want to establish, not only that this CA is collecting on an invalid debt, but that if the debt is passed onto another, the OC is willfully breaching your agreement if he does so. The CA licensing issue is only a small part of this. Whether the AG goes after the CA may depend on various factors, but one that could tip the decision might be that the OC is unlicensed, or that the CA is aware the debt is invalid based on your settlement agreement.
You probably already have sufficient basis to pull either CA or OC into court, but the most direct path may be against the OC, since that undermines the CA's claim. You might also forward to the AG, as an addendum to your license complaint against the OC, the name of the CA, and the fact that they, too, are not licensed.
I am putting the heat on them now not the other way around. The CA is now propably woundering what the heck did I get myself into here this NUTCASE is coming to my office to get every document concerning the debt INCLUDING the CAs proof of license, bond and organizational papers to do BIZ in AZ I know the CA has none of these their Corporate CHarter was revoked awhile back. Also the CA is a whitness to the OCs Fraudalent Bill. The CA Claims they confirmed VERBALLY from the OC all work was done per the cheezzzzy barely readble bill they sent me. What hucksters.......if this was 100 yrs ago then I would be calling them out the settle things the old way of the WEST. this did occur in Tucson and not to far from Thomstone!!! Ok Partner meet me on the street yaaa dirty dealin low down SKUNK!!! SKI
