WARNING! Do not read if you don't want to hear my response to "OPEN QUESTIONS TO BBAUER" I have asked PBM to publicly post the reason another thread was closed. This is only to answer a few questions that I was not allowed to respond to... Understand that I will not be posting another message is this thread. RICHGUY: I'm sorry that the links appearing in my signature were unhelpful for you. The truth is they don't help many people who come to creditnet they're answers to many "entry level" questions... but the fact remains that many people have publicly comment they did help them and they appreciate them. If you have a problem with links in signatures or the size of signatures, you should contact PBM so he can listen to your request and adapt the board policy as he thinks is needed. For now, they remain. I have already answered your other questions in a thread called the "Credit Repair Organizations Act". If you do a search for it, you will find exactly where Bill has broken and continues to break the law with his CreditWrench service. You can also click one of the unhelpful links to read what the FTC says about these companies or read the law directly. BBauer: I use evidence, when you make libelous statements against me, I hope you also. Please quote a single caselaw example of "valuable consideration." When you say that courts from all across the land and from the lowest to the highest court hold this defintion, I'm sure that it will not be too hard to find one. BTW, PLEASE show me ANY example of where I broke the law... Don't say because I show you how to obey the law, I'm breaking it. Again, because you did not object, I will be writing the FTC and the OK AG next week to seek their opinions about Creditwrench's legal requirements and the CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT. Thank you....
