Hi, the next question is: Were they represented by Katz & Korin in Indianapolis? The next question is were you representing yourself? Next question is if you got a letter from a paralegal at Katz & Korin directing you to only communicate with Katz & Korin. Next question is did the letter contain a "variation of accurate information" with respect to your name in the portion of the letter that names the parties in the lawsuit. Did the body of the short letter imply that you are an attorney? You would, of course, be representing the party spelled out by the "variation" of your accurate name. It is not my understanding that a consumer loses his/her right to speak to a CRA or dispute credit information, request disclosure, etc.. upon that consumer's exercising of a Constituional right, use of the courts. If you have a letter of this sort or something close to it, please check in. thanks as ALWAYS!
