What if, say....hypothetically of course!! Aperson requests verification of something in March 2002 and a month later it comes back verified.....BUT then you pull a NEW report in July 2002 and it says that the last time it was verified was August 2001. Now, do I have someone by the (_)(_)'s or what?
In the strictist sence of the word, EVERYTHING on your report is supposed to be correct, so yes I guess you have a beef...however if I were to appear in front of a judge, I would NOT want this to be my only violation (maybe I, if it were my 49th bit of ammo/evidence to show how inept the CRA's accuracy of reports really are). After all you can proabably find much more "damaging" mistakes on your report, can't you? -Peace, Dave
the other alternative, which I think you may be getting at, is that the item was never really verified. Or not verified properly. The way the item is listed is irrelevant for those purposes. When you file suit you should always subpoena copies of the communications between the CRA and the OC and all responses/verifications from the OC.
