Illinois AG vs. Arrow http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/01/il_arrow.html "Illinois Sues Nationwide Debt Collector, Arrow Financial Firm Uses Unfair Tactics, Deceptive Practices, State Charges January 26, 2007 Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan has filed suit in Cook County Circuit Court alleging that a debt collector used unfair tactics and deceptive practices to collect money from consumers. Madigan's lawsuit names Arrow Financial Services, LLC, of Niles, Illinois. Madigan sued another collectiona agency, Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, earlier this month. Arrow is a debt buyer and attempts to collect monies ranging from approximately $100 to over $10,000 per debt from consumers nationwide. Since 1999, Madigan's Consumer Fraud Bureau has received 669 consumer complaints against Arrow. Madigan's lawsuit charges Arrow with multiple violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. The suit specifically alleges that Arrow attempts to collect on time-barred debts over ten years old, attempts to collect on debts that have been discharged in bankruptcy or that have been settled, engages in abusive practices in an attempt to collect, such as using profanity, attempts to obtain payment without proof of debt, refuses or fails to provide proof of debt, illegally contacts consumers' family members and workplace, and withdraws money without authorization from consumers' bank accounts. Madigan's suit contains a number of specific examples of consumer complaints concerning Arrow's conduct. For example, according to Madigan's lawsuit, Arrow allegedly contacted one Franklin Park, Ill., consumer through the mail, informing him that he owes approximately $600 on a Montgomery Ward account that he had cancelled ten years ago. Soon thereafter, the consumer allegedly began receiving calls and notices regarding the debt approximately once a week for several months at a time. When the consumer explained to Arrow that he had cancelled the credit card ten years ago and did not owe any debt, Arrow responded that if he once owned the credit card, then he was obliged to pay for the debt. The consumer disputed the debt and asked for written proof. In response, Arrow threatened to sue the consumer and never provided any evidence of the debt allegedly owed. Arrow's conduct has come to the attention of other state enforcement offices. In November 2005, the Minnesota Department of Commerce imposed against Arrow Financial Services, LLC, a $125,000 fine, the largest civil penalty ever imposed against a collection agency licensed in Minnesota. As part of this process, Arrow was required to implement a compliance program to: (1) designate a compliance officer in charge of all regulatory compliance matters, (2) implement a training program for all Arrow debt collectors, which includes the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Minnesota debt collection laws, (3) require Arrow debt collectors to sign a statement in which they acknowledge training completion, which includes debt collection law, and (4) establish written policies and procedures for screening debt collector applicants and conduct criminal background checks. "Consumers should not be harassed or intimidated by unscrupulous debt collectors. We are focused on protecting Illinois consumers and others affected by businesses that use unfair and deceptive debt collection tactics," Madigan said. Madigan's lawsuit asks the court to prohibit Arrow from engaging in deceptive debt collection activities and further violating Illinois' consumer protection laws. The lawsuit seeks a civil penalty of $50,000 and additional penalties of $50,000 for each violation found to have been committed with intent to defraud. Finally, Madigan's lawsuit asks the court to order Arrow to pay restitution to consumers and to pay all costs for prosecution and investigation of this case. ..."
The original press release: http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/pressroom/2007_01/20070125b.html And the complaint: http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/pressroom/2007_01/arrow_financial_complaint.pdf
Thanks for the PR noticing Leading Edge Recovery... I think (in addition to the counts included against them) the part of their phone message which states that it is "IMPERATIVE" that you or your attorney contact our office by 9:00 PM TONIGHT. That sounds really stretching it towards "false threat of legal action"; and over-shadowing, since heck, they never even provided a validation notice, yet... Yes, the first voice mail hints at grave repercussions for not calling TODAY... Gee, I called, and they got faxed a suit within 5 hours of their voice mail (two hours after I returned the call)... I just wish that the LE complaint was linked into the PR...
Arrow sent me a dunning, I sent a DV letter, they sent me a letter telling me how much I owed and to contact Bay Area LLC to get it paid. Anyone have any luck with these idiots. They never validated the debt and as I read, they never do either.