I've just been cruising the archives again and was pulling up anything to do with Foleys. I followed Jlynns posts and saw she ended up getting her goal with Foleys. I have had no such luck and find them to be liars. Any advice appreciated. I think I am at the sue point and have violations but some questions too. In one of the threads, someopme said they got a 98 charge-off and it hurt the score. The longer history was stronger than the r9 rating. So, will that score go up or is that-that? Also, any help with letters directly to Foleys and got some action would help. I've done PFB 3 times and keep getting higher up. But no admitting the reporting is wrong even though all 3 reports are different and different than the account history they sent me. I know I have something here but maybe a different approach or opinion could help. One more question, do you have to be notified that something is being charged off? I was not even in the state or ever knew of these charges untill pulling a credit report. They did have my current address I assume as they've verified it over and over again.
Letter Number 1: January 2, 2002 Foleys P. O. Box 1971 Houston, TX 77251 Re: Account No.xxxxx Revolving Account No.xxxx Installment To Whom It May Concern: In a recent review of my husbandâ??s credit reports, and mine, it came to our attention that Foleys was reporting inaccurate information. Upon disputing this information with the CRAâ??s, I was livid to discover that Foleys verified â??the accuracyâ? of the information they furnished. 1.My report is alleging I was 90+ days late 24 times on one report, and 23 times on another. This same account is reported as 90+ days late 5 times on my husbandâ??s report. Please explain how Foleys verified all this differing information was accurate on each of these reports. 2.Foleys claims that the revolving account was opened in 10/92. This was the one piece of information that was consistent on all reports. However, neither my husband nor I were living in or visiting the United States in October of 1992. The actual country we were living in did not have a Foleys. Please explain how this information was verified. 3.Foleys claims that the Date of Last Activity (DOLA) on the revolving account on my reports was 8/99, yet on my husbandâ??s report the DOLA is shown as 4/99. Please explain how Foleys verified two different dates, yet there can only be one unique DOLA. 4.The DOLA for the installment account is also showing as 4/99 on one of my reports, and 8/99 on another. Again, how did Foleys verify the accuracy of two different dates, when only one date is possible? 5.On one report, the installment account is being reported as an â??Openâ? status. Please explain how an installment loan, which, by definition, is a close-end loan in which there is a definite ending date, can remain open with a â??0- balance. Again, how did Foleyâ??s even verify this? 6.Foleys is reporting that the revolving account is â??Openâ?. This account has had no activity in over three years, yet remains open? If this account is indeed my account, you are placing me in great jeopardy of additional billing errors on behalf of Foleys that I would know nothing about! Due to the numerous inconsistencies and inaccuracies, I demand that Foleys send me certified, true and correct copies of my original application for both the revolving and installment account, showing the date these accounts were opened, as well as true and correct copies of each and every one of the monthly statements generated from the date of the first alleged delinquency, through to, and including the month of the last activity of each of these accounts. Please know that you have 30 days from the tracked and confirmed delivery of this lawful notice to either answer these demands or to remove the associated negative tradeline notations from the CRA reports. Please be further advised that continued unsubstantiated reporting of possible inaccuracies to third parties may provide a basis for criminal complaints being filed in accordance with FDCPA, FCRA, and other federal statutes. Your timely attention to this matter is appreciated. Best Regards, jlynn CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0860 0003 xxxxx
Letter No. 2: February 28, 2003 Foleys P. O. Box 1971 Houston, TX 77251 Re: Account No.xxxx Revolving NOTICE OF Intent to FILE LAWSUIT To Whom It May Concern: This Letter shall serve as formal notice of my intent to file a lawsuit against your company, due to your blatant and objectionable disregard of the law. On January 6, 2003, you received a letter outlining numerous reporting errors on my credit reports with the three Consumer Reporting Agencies. This was sent certified mail (7002086000039261xxxx). As of today you have failed to correct the errors on my report in regards to the above referenced account with Experian. In fact, despite correcting the errors on both my husbandâ??s and my reports with the other agencies, you verified the information on the above referenced account was correct on my report only. I have enclosed a copy of the original dispute letter, as well as the applicable page from my Experian report. You have violated multiple areas of Section 623(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. If Foleys continues to violate this act I will file complaints with any and all federal and/or state agencies charged with administering this act under Section 621. Further, you have violated Section 623(b) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which allows for a cause of action by an individual. I am sure you are aware of the penalties for violating the FCRA, but if not I will remind you: § 616. Civil liability for willful noncompliance [15 U.S.C. § 1681n] (a) In general. Any person who willfully fails to comply with any requirement imposed under this title with respect to any consumer is liable to that consumer in an amount equal to the sum of (1)(A) any actual damages sustained by the consumer as a result of the failure or damages of not less than $100 and not more than $1,000; or (B) in the case of liability of a natural person for obtaining a consumer report under false pretenses or knowingly without a permissible purpose, actual damages sustained by the consumer as a result of the failure or $1,000, whichever is greater; (2) such amount of punitive damages as the court may allow; and (3) in the case of any successful action to enforce any liability under this section, the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the court. Please be aware if these accounts are not corrected within 10 days of the tracked and confirmed delivery of this letter, I will be filing a lawsuit for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. I will be seeking civil liability in the amount of $1000 per violation. Thank you and I look forward to resolving this most expeditiously. jlynn CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0860 0003 xxxxx This one finished it off, everything is reporting paid as agreed, never late.
I never tried PFB, nor did I look for a higher up. I left their address on here, so you can compare if that is the one you are sending too. Good luck and hang tough! Also, I used the validation technique - as soon as Foleys received the green cards, I redisputed with the CRAs.
Thanks for responding! I sent a series of letters, but none probably as well layed out as your last. Let me ask this, on the 3rd mgr that replied to me, he told me I had earlier written the the wrong address. It was the address on my cr and the one you have. He claimed ththat was the reason the account was not reported as in dispute. Yet you seem to have gotten through. Well, let's see. My last letter claimed I would sue, but probably not strong enough. Do you think I should fire off one more like your last one, maybe with a filled out small claims form? I actually am not anxious to sue but have enough paperwork to easily prove they are full of crap. Did they ever respond to that letter, or it just came off. Before, I would have been happy with the deletion but now I'm just mad. I found out yesterday that they now say the charg-off date was in 1999. Funny, 3/98 on other reports, and 7/98 from the company letter. I am curious too. Did they pull your report after you questioned them on this matter? Thanks again for responding. I've looked at other OC threads but insider advice is the best. Gonna go back and re-read those letters again!
OMG, I just now realized when I copied and pasted the penalties, I included the PP part. Too funny!!!! No, they didn't pull a report, but the revolving is still open, and they didn't mark it closed after this dispute. I called their automated number - its open with a -0- CL. LOL! Anyway, I didn't push that issue because the account is very OLD, so it looks good.
Ginger, I never heard from them via letter or phone call. Thats why I recommended backing up yourself by putting it into dispute again at the same time. Hit em from both sides. And none of that "wrong address" BS.
I actually did dispute it , many times. Comes back verified everytime. I even had a TU rep state it was incorrect information after hearing of the letter they sent me. I faxed that letter and asked for deletion and it was verified!!! I disputed after each contact with them and it always verifies. It is just a bad thing! But I will try a similar letter to yours (if you don't mind) and dispute again when the green card comes in. I have many violations and I'm done with them denying it. I just have never had to sue and am spending time on other sites reading court cases and making sure I know what I'm talking about. Only problem is, will the judge? If this last letter doesn't get action and I hear of no other solutions, then I will sue. In Washington State! I'm glad you got yours fixed and it just shows me even more that they know nothing about credit issues. I think I may do a search now for cases against the company. Ohhh, another night obsessed with credit!!!