Judgment Discovered on Credit Report

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by equinox308, Jan 18, 2010.

  1. equinox308

    equinox308 Member

    Greetings-

    I have some unpaid credit card debts stemming back 10 years ago and since receive the occasional 'collection letters' from various companies who bought off the credit card debts from the original credit card companies.

    Most recently I just requested my credit report for the first time and found out from the credit report I have no "collections" actions,etc. but under "Public Records", I have a Judgment on my account filed 11/2005 with a local court and the fee amount of $7,000 from Plaintiff: Credigy Receivables. Over the years I never received any notice from anyone regarding this. It may or may not be correct, so my first question is what should I do from here to get this resolved or even removed from my credit report?

    The other question-today I received a letter from a Gryphon Solutions referencing the above Judgment and stating that they have the authority to resolve my account in full for $956. Is this a fraud or is this legitimate, and what should I do, take the offer or find a lawyer?? (what type of Lawyer can best help me in this situation??)

    Thanks for your time and replies



    I was able to find the case by case number as referenced by Gryphon Solutions on the local court website and have copied and pasted it below, I will also try to attempt to obtain the full case file from the court and keep everyone posted:



    Case Information

    Associated Cases

    Number:

    XXX-CV-XXXXX

    Title:

    Credigy Receivables, Inc. XXXX

    Category:

    Collections - Limited

    Filed:

    8/24/2005 Disposed: 11/30/2005 Status: Post




    Involved Parties


    Type

    Name

    Disposition

    Plaintiff

    Credigy Receivables, Inc.
    None

    CV-BT EntryReqDism-No ADR



    Attorney:

    Donald R. Stebbins
    Mann Bracken LLP , 2325 Clayton Road, Concord, Ca 94520

    Defendant

    XXX
    None

    CV-BT EntryReqDism-No ADR

    Assignee

    Gold Line Credit Holdings, Llc
    None

    None



    Attorney:

    Michael K. Sipes
    Michael K. Sipes Law Offices , 3050 Fite Circle, Suite 107, Sacramento, Ca 95827

    Assignee

    The Gabriel Group, Llc
    None

    None







    Calendared Events


    Date

    Time

    Event Description

    Result

    Notice Printed

    Reset

    Description

    By

    Date

    To

    From

    3/28/2006

    03:00PM

    CV CMC-Case Management Conf

    CMC vacated; Jgmt before CMC

    K

    11/30/05

    None

    None

    None




    Documents


    Number-Sequence

    Document Description

    Filed

    Ruling

    Date

    0013-000

    Cv Assignment Of Judgment

    12/04/2009

    None

    12/04/2009



    For: The Gabriel Group, LLC / ASG

    0012-000

    Cv Abstract Of Judgment Issued

    05/12/2008

    None

    05/12/2008



    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT
    Against: XXX / DEF

    0011-000

    Cv Substitution Of Attorney

    04/15/2008

    None

    04/15/2008



    For: Gold Line Credit Holdings, LLC / ASG

    0010-000

    Cv Assignment Of Judgment

    04/15/2008

    None

    04/15/2008



    For: Gold Line Credit Holdings, LLC / ASG
    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT
    Against: XXX / DEF

    0009-000

    Cv Abstract Of Judgment Issued

    12/21/2005

    None

    12/21/2005



    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT
    Against: XXX / DEF

    0008-000

    Cv Judgment After Default

    11/30/2005

    None

    11/30/2005



    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT
    Against: XXX / DEF

    0007-000

    Cv Req:Dismissal, Partial W/O Prej

    11/15/2005

    None

    11/30/2005



    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT

    0006-000

    Cv Default Entered

    11/15/2005

    None

    11/30/2005



    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT
    Against: XXX / DEF

    0004-000

    Cv Proof Of Svc Compl/Pet/Summons

    09/23/2005

    None

    09/23/2005



    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT
    Against: XXX / DEF

    0003-000

    Cv Summons W/Proof Of Svc

    09/23/2005

    None

    09/23/2005



    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT
    Against: XXX / DEF

    0002-000

    Cv Complaint Filed/Summs Iss <$10k

    08/24/2005

    None

    08/25/2005



    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT
    Against: XXX / DEF

    0001-000

    Cv Case Cover Sheet

    08/24/2005

    None

    08/25/2005



    For: Credigy Receivables, Inc. / PLT
    Against: XXX / DEF
     
  2. JoshuaHeckathorn

    JoshuaHeckathorn Administrator

    Welcome to the forum equinox.

    Judgments can be difficult to dispute and get removed from your reports because they are public record and easily verifiable by the CRAs. That said, if you were never properly served, you may have a chance to get it vacated.

    I would recommend reading up on your state's rules and procedures for filing a motion to vacate, and then deciding if you feel like you can handle all the paperwork or would rather find a good lawyer that specializes in consumer protection, debtor/creditor or bankruptcy law.

    Also, I wouldn't pay anyone anything until you figure out what went down with the judgment you have against you. If it's legitimate, then determine who your rightfully owe and negotiate payment directly with them. Don't be too quick to jump at a settlement offer from someone out of the blue.
     
  3. equinox308

    equinox308 Member

    I have some unpaid credit card debts stemming back 10 years ago and since receive the occasional 'collection letters' from various companies who bought off the credit card debts from the original credit card companies.



    Most recently I just requested my credit report for the first time and found out from the credit report I have no "collections" actions,etc. but under Public Records, that I have a Judgment on my account filed 11/2005 with a local court and the fee amount of $7,000 from Plaintiff: Credigy Receivables. Over the years I never received any notice from anyone regarding this and never saw any letters from a "Credigy Receivables" at all.



    I obtained the entire case file from the court and my name on the Judgment is correct, however, all "two" of the addresses listed where I was served were totally way off. In addition it listed that the served letter was left with a "co-occupant" at one of the wrong addresses whose name I never even heard of.



    Then on Jan 15th, 2010 I received a letter from a Gryphon Solutions referencing the above Judgment and stating that they have the authority to resolve my account in full for $956. I did verify their name as one of the most recent plaintiff's named on the Judgment who bought the case from a previous plaintiff/collector(s).



    Then now on Jan 25th, 2010 I received a letter "DEPOSITION OF SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION OF BUSINESS RECORDS" from an attorney referencing they represent Gryphon Solutions requiring copies of paycheck stubs, bank statements, etc for a current credit card account I have which has been paid to date and in good standing..the letter lists my accurate social security number for the first time in all documents ever received pertaining to this case and Judgment, and references a current credit card I have and the date it was opened...WHAT DOES THIS CURRENT ACCOUNT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING or past debts?? I believe they obtained this info

    (current good standing credit card, social security number, current accurate address) from a recent credit report as my credit reports indicate they made the inquiry sometime 12/2009.



    So my questions are: 1.) perhaps my Judgment may be for the wrong person as none of the addresses served were correct (my credit reports clearly indicate all my accurate previous addresses). What can I do to get this removed or resolved?? **If for some reason the Judgment is correct, I was served at wrong addresses and didn't find out until now, what can I do then??



    2.)Re. the Gryphon Solutions offer to settle, why would they send me an offer one Jan 15th (offer expiration date of Feb 11th) and then later send a subpoena for records on Jan 25th (respond by Feb 22 date)??? Are they trying to get me to settle based on their offer?

    **And why are they asking to subpoena information for an unrelated account, one that is current and paid in good standing??





    Thank you for reading this case in detail and please do offer your suggestions and relevant legal course of actions.
     

Share This Page