Long timeline, but here it is: 3/19/2003 Sherman and I settle - they pay me $1000 and give me letters to each CRA requesting removal of their TL. 6/30/03 I send a copy of this letter to TU requesting deletion of the TL. 7/19/03 I obtain CRA from TU showing Sherman is still there. I send ITS letter to TU demanding deletion per previous correspondance. 8/19/03 TU sends me a letter to take the matter up with Sherman. 8/26/03 Realizing TU will not comply, a summons is issued for violation of FCRA 611-a-1-A, 611-1-4 and 607-b. 9/9/03 TU Answers No Discovery in the interim - AZ Small Claims does not allow it. 7/21/04 Trial set for 8/31/04 Some time between 9/9/03 and 7/21/04 the Sherman TL is removed, but the suit is still active. I called the contact at TU today looking for a settlement. They are prepared to send someone from Fullerton CA to Tucson for the trial. EFX did when I sued them - all the way from Atlanta. Since the only negative item on my TU at this point is a CH13 that will come off in November 2005, I am prepared to offer removal of that NOW - permanently - in full settlement. Any comments?
Some time between 9/9/03 and 7/21/04 the Sherman TL is removed, but the suit is still active. ********************************** They never take it off the report when we make it right so why should we take it off the docket when they do?
