I can host this thing for free.. just email me the SQL Server DB file.. I am running SQL Server 2k.. Let me know which domain you guys want it on.. and I'll point the domain to the IP.
Re: Re: millennium cbs I am still OPEN to this idea.. anyone know john's email? if someone has it, please send it to me at: ender510@yahoo.com or if u can email me directly john.. I can host the site and the files. I just need the SQL dumpf rom SQL Server.. let me know
Re: Re: millennium cbs Psychdoc has a deal going too. He has a great way to get the job done. I think there is a copy of his report here on the board. If not, ask him for it and he will send it to you.
Re: Re: millennium cbs yes thank goodness for psychdoc saving the info, but the only problem is that you can't determine what scores are necessary for acceptance or denial, etc which was one of the great feature of millcbs.... not to be ungrateful in anyway to psychdoc's contribution
Re: Re: millennium cbs I never paid much attention to the old millcbs board. Went there a couple of times is all. So I guess I missed what you are talking about. Do you have any idea how that was determined? Should be easy to set up the way Doc is doing it.
Re: Re: millennium cbs when people entered their data, they also had the choice of including whether they were approved or declined and listing the credit score for the given CRA file that was checked. Very informative.
Re: Re: millennium cbs Even if JOHN DOE in TX had XXXX CREDIT CARD COMPANY pull EQUIFAX...MARY DOE in TX might have TRANS UNION pulled for the same exact XXXX CREDIT CARD COMPANY!!!
Re: Re: millennium cbs Agreed GEORGE... but in my experience the info on millcbs was pretty much right-on target. Actually, I don't think I ever had an unexpected CRA checked when I checked the database first, but in this regard, psychdocs list is still very useful. I just miss being able to reserch credit score approval/decline trends before applying so as not to waste a precious inquiry
Re: Re: Re: millennium cbs It's better than NOTHIN' I just made the statement...because some people had some ATTITUDE because it said one CRA and they pulled a different one... In MOST cases...it is ALWAYS SUBJECT TO CHANGE
