Need help with an older collection

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by dragracr36, Aug 14, 2009.

  1. dragracr36

    dragracr36 Active Member

    My husband has a credit card collection that is right at the point of falling off of his credit report. It was sold once or twice. The last one to have it was Arrow Financial Services. Actually according to the free annual report we get it shows the OC and the CA to fall off 01/2010. Now he has received a letter from another CA, Northland Group Inc, stating that they have been assigned for collection. What do I need to do? I mean this is about to fall off his CR and I dont want another sitting out there for the 7 yrs. The specifics are as follows:

    OC
    DOFD - 2/2003
    Amount of chg off - $579

    Assigned to Arrow Financial
    Past due amt went up to $1071

    Assigned to Northland Group
    Past due amt went up to $1201.87
    offering to settle for $180.28

    I have no intention of paying it this late in the game, especially since this was pre-marriage to him. Just want all this to go away. I am just certain that this is a scavanger collector that just wants some money out of it. Any advice on what needs to be done? Thanks in advance!
     
  2. ccbob

    ccbob Well-Known Member

    The first thing you should do whenever you get a debt collection letter is send a DV (dispute and request for validation).

    If the collection shows up on your credit report, dispute the entry with the credit bureau (after you've sent the DV letter).

    After the original entry falls off, then dispute any other collection entries with the credit bureau to remove them as well.
     
  3. cap1sucks

    cap1sucks Well-Known Member

    So, the original entry falls off after 7 years and 180 days have elapsed. What do you suggest someone would use as a reason to dispute the remaining entries?
     
  4. ccbob

    ccbob Well-Known Member

    The corresponding collection entries should be aged off the same DOFD, so if they, too, don't fall off at about the same time, they should be disputed as "obsolete."
     
  5. apexcrsrv

    apexcrsrv Well-Known Member

    Bob is correct . . . in addition, the account type and status are typically inaccurate.
     

Share This Page