Sure it is. The facts are: 2 scoring systems developed to "accurately" predict your credit worthyness, supposedly based on the same credit profile...(maybe differing components of it...maybe differing weights on those components...I am told one of the 2 even incorporates the average daily temperature of Bora-Bora in their formula). Our arrival at the NEW score approximation based on interpretation of the OLD scores and their coorelation to each other, may not be based on your facts, but they are based on facts. Actually they SHOULD be highly coorelated ...IF they TRULY were predicters of (y)our credit worthyness. Or worth anything at all. -Peace, Dave
Q: Who uses that 3-D vector crap? A: Lots of immigrants with engineering jobs who make more money than most of us due to the fact that they finished all their engineering classes, including Calculus III. (Despite the reality that they don't understand science or care about good design, which reality they successfully hide using that 3-D vector crap, which too few Americans bothered to study.)
