Need your support..bill for new law

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by deniserich, Dec 14, 2004.

  1. deniserich

    deniserich Banned

    We need monthly statements NOT coupon books while paying our Mortagage payments. Here we go again!!!!!

    In early October we paid our Mortgage payment for our November 1st payment, as well as our cable bill. We inadvertently placed the checks in the wrong envelopes. Comcastâ??s payment went to our mortgage company and our mortgage check of nearly $600.00 went to Comcast. This simple error has turned into an exhaustive, costly process to clear up.

    We pay our monthly mortgage payment utilizing a coupon payment book provided by our mortgage company. We do not get a monthly statement. Therefore, we had no way of knowing this mistake of sending the wrong checks to the wrong companies took place as NEITHER the mortgage company nor Comcast bothered to make a telephone call to advise us of this error.

    On or about Nov. 17th we received a letter from our mortgage company advising us that we owed our November payment along with a late charge. Knowing that we are NEVER late on any payments, I pulled our bank statement out and found that the check had cleared. I contacted the Mortgage Company to advise them of this and they asked us to obtain a copy of the front and back of the check. As our credit union/bank no longer sends us our cancelled checks with our bank statement, we had to order and pay for copies of the cleared check.

    The next morning we went to pay for and pick up the check. We immediately faxed it to our Mortgage company. Later that afternoon I called to confirm it had been taken care of and they relayed that they were researching it and as long as I had the cancelled check, we didnâ??t have to worry about the late payment, etc.

    Believing all was taken care of we enjoyed our Thanksgiving and felt the issue was over. To our surprise, we received a phone call on December 1st at 5pm notifying us that through their "research" they found they had not cashed the check, rather Comcast had cashed it. I asked if they cashed our comcast check then....their was no mention of that money....As far as our comcast check sent to them..., they placed $25.00, and change, on principal and retained the other $25.00 for a late charge, even though on their notice they sent us infoming us we were late, never indicated they received ANY payment, such as the comcast check.

    Further upsetting was the fact that now it was December 1st, which means our perfect credit rating would NOW reflect a 30 day late payment which would be reported electronically to the credit bureaus. I know first hand how difficult it is correcting an erroneous credit report.

    In an attempt to overt this foreseeable problem I asked to pay the payment over the phone as it was NOW, December 1st, and we would track the money down with Comcast ourselves. They allowed me to do so however they also charged a fee to pay by check over the phone. After doing so I asked if this stopped the reporting to the CRAâ??s. My answer was that since it wouldnâ??t be credited until December 2nd, it most likely would in fact be electronically reported however, we could get copies of our credit reports and dispute the 30 day late payment and they would respond to the CRAâ??s it was in error. Right!! Sounds familiar!

    As you can see, had the mortgage company (or Comcast) contacted us prior to crediting our account, all of this could have been averted. I donâ??t understand how a check written payable to a mortgage Company could be cashed by Comcast. Further upsetting is that it would come across an employeeâ??s desk and they would physically credit our account, paying us ahead, and not contact us. They had to know it was not our intention as the amount was large and not payable to Comcast, rather to a Mortgage Company..

    A check made payable to someone else should have raised a red flag for someone to contact us. We would have then been apprised to what had happened and could have rectified it immediately prior to enduring these costs, credit concerns and anxiety dealing with rectifying a mess that was exacerbated unnecessarily.

    Had the Mortage company contacted us in October, when they received the November payment, and well before December 1st, we wouldnâ??t be in the "system" to be reported as a 30 day late payment to begin with. Had we received a monthly mortgage statement from them we would have seen that we were not credited for our payment. By our paying with a coupon book as we do, we all have no way of knowing if our payments are applied properly and in this case our bank statement showed the check had cleared.

    I think it speaks volumes that corporations contact their customers if a bill is late, but do not contact customers when an obvious overpayment was made and when the check was payable to another company. I have contacted my Congressman, Peter Deutsch, to assist me in sponsoring a bill requiring monthly statements as opposed to utilizing coupon books. This is my second time around with major difficulties due to utilizing coupon payment books.

    Paying additional principal while utilizing a coupon book does not allow us to track where our payments are being applied. This is where my troubles began so many years ago.

    In 1992 I wanted to refinance my mortgage, I had been paying with coupon book. To my horror, I found many payments were misapplied and my extra principal payments were not credited. Many amortization schedules later, it became quite apparent that they had no idea how to derive at the amount I actually owed.

    After living this nightmare, I testified before the Massachusetts Banking Committee and sponsored a Bill with Senator Stan Rosenberg (S16). I submitted petitions signed by tens of hundreds of consumers, trying to enact a law mandating all mortgage companies/lenders to send consumers monthly statements to afford us our right to verify and track that our payments are being applied correctly. Especially our extra principal and escrow payments.

    Not only did S.16 not get set aside but the bill was warmly welcomed by the legislators. After hearing of what happened to me, they gasped and openly spoke of their fears as they too pay down on the principal monthly with extra payments and blindly trust the payments are applied properly. The bill was never enacted into law due to the report coming back that it would only mandate the State Chartered Banks and most were already utilizing monthly statements. Further, Fleet Bank told the committee they voluntarily were opting to use monthly statments in the future. A monthly statement is the only way we can verify this information as we would see monthly how our payments were applied. That way we could stop any problem immediately and not years down the road where it is impossible to verify the correct amount due the creditor when attempting to refinance or sell the property.

    The only way to stop this abuse is to fight for monthly statements. If you agree that we need to be able to verify how our mortgage payments are being applied, please forward a copy of this letter or your own letter to your representatives supporting this necessary change.

    Denise Richardson

    Hollywood, FL

    deniserichardson1@netzero.com
     
  2. Hedwig

    Hedwig Well-Known Member

    An automatic debit from your account on a set date would solve the problem without requiring statements. I haven't seen a statement or a coupon book in years. I get an annual statement, and I call the 800 number periodically if I want to know the balance.

    The 9th of every month, rain, snow, sleet, hail or illness, my mortgage payment is made to the correct company.
     
  3. GEORGE

    GEORGE Well-Known Member

    PAY ON-LINE FROM CHECKING or DIRECT BILL CHARGE TO MY VISA/MC/DISCOVER/AMEX

    PROBLEM SOLVED
     
  4. Flyingifr

    Flyingifr Well-Known Member

    My bank has a free "bill pay" service - they write the check, they pay the postage and they guarantee the payment will be there on the day they say it will be. If your bank doesn't have this service, Yahoo Finance does ( www.yahoo.com ) and click on Finance, then Bill Pay.
     
  5. deniserich

    deniserich Banned

    No, an automatic debit does not stop the problem it only exacerbates it. let me explain why....A lot of us like to include additional principal money in our payments to bring down the cost of interest and payoff our loans quicker. However, without having a monthly statement to verify that this was done properly, we have no way of know if we have paid down the principal or if they mis-applied which I have found from many consumers to be the case. Take for example, being paid in advance without you knowing it (it happend to me and they had me paid a year in advance without giving me the interest credit) also, payments made on (for example) January 23rd for the Feb. 1st payment, were actually applied as a LATE payt. for February and a late charge was addtionally taken out of the supposed "extra" principal paid. This was all only discovered after months of wrong amortization schedules. It only makes sense that if you are paying on a 15 or 30 year loan and you want to track and watch your principal go down monthly, that monthly statement are the only way we can verify this. If an error is found immediately, it can be rectified without tracking back months of misapplied interest credits. I know of people who had no idea they were not applying their payments properly until they went to sell their home and then found out the lender had mis-applied several thousands of dollars. it was such a mess, as mine once was, that they couldn't sell until a year later after the ocurts got involved to correct. HUD estimated a few years back that over 1 BILLION dollars were owed to consumers in misapplied escrow monies...that doesn't even count our "extra" addtional principal payments.
     
  6. pd11604

    pd11604 Well-Known Member

    I guess some mortgage companies are better than others when it comes to accounting for extra payments.

    The payment details should be spelled out in the agreement so that there is no confusion where extra payments are going.

    It's possible that a regular bank will do a better job of accounting than the mortgage companies
     
  7. deniserich

    deniserich Banned

    It doesn't matter what is spelled out in a an agreement or mortgage as far as how they account for payments. We should know that simply by reading of all the posts on this site that pertain to errors made on their accounts or credit reports continual errors happen. The mistakes made by lenders are the same type as the credit industry, systemic...If there were not so many errors and inaccuracies, there wouldn't't be so many law suits and sites such as this wouldn't be necessary. Our right to verify how our payments are handled should be common sense. Being unable to verify how our payments are applied, not only affects our mortgage but it also affects student loans and car payments as well.

    Late payments can be deducted from your extra principal payments or added on to the payoff balance of your loan without our knowledge. I know of people who had the term of their mortgage extended simply by misapplied escrow and extra principal monies and late charges inaccurately posted to their accounts. Most student loans are also paid by coupon books.

    From clarkhoward.com Clark is a Radio show host from Atlanta... this is part of one of his articles on his site.


    Student loan payers owe more money - April 16, 2003
    Would it be a bargain if you owed a student loan and the company made a math error and started collecting less money from you? It might be fun when you got to what you thought was the end and youâ??d paid off the loan. But it would be quite a let down when the company discovered its mistake and presented you with a huge bill thousands more dollars. Well, it happened to Sallie Mae, one of the largest student loan providers in the country. It happened because of a computer programming error and is now affecting more than 1 million people. If you have a 10-year variable rate, federally guaranteed loans, including Stafford and Plus loans. If you havenâ??t started a repayment plan, you are not affected. But those who have started a plan will owe money. It took Sallie Mae six months to find out what was going on, so it will take a while to get the error corrected. The good news is that Sallie Mae is waiving the additional interest on the loans. You still owe the balance, but they will not charge you interest. So, essentially youâ??re getting the remainder of your loan interest free. Clark thinks this is a smart, fair move on Sallie Maeâ??s part. You need to remember that the student loan system is extremely inaccurate, so itâ??s important for you to run your own amortization schedule. And be sure to keep your student loan records forever! from http://www.clarkhoward.com

    the petition will be presented to our regulators and legislators for both student loans and mortgage payments see: http://www.ipetitions.com/campaigns/monthlystatements/

    Accounting errors and computer errors in the banking industry are like the credit industry, systemic. There wouldn't be lawsuits or the need for sites like this if there were no accounting errors. Please take a moment to sign the petition. If it hasn't happened to you yet (that you are aware of) it doesn't mean that it won't.
    _________________
    Denise Richardson
    Hollywood, FL
    deniserichardson1@netzero.com
     
  8. Hedwig

    Hedwig Well-Known Member

    I still can't see FORCING them to send a statement. I wouldn't want one.

    If I ever paid extra principal (which I wouldn't), I would have my regular payment auto debited. Then I could send a check for the extra, along with a note that it is extra principal.

    I would then check the mortgage company site in a week or so to make sure it was properly applied. There still would be no chance of late fees or late payments.

    I do this with several of my credit cards. So I know that what is due will be paid when due. If I want to send extra money, fine.

    I shred enough stuff now without getting more useless clutter. I don't need a book or a statement.
     
  9. ontrack

    ontrack Well-Known Member

    You are assuming that your loan servicer is acting in good faith.

    Although you might choose to get your statements on-line, to prevent predatory actions toward less sophisticated, or sub-prime consumers, who also might be buying a house, timely statements would catch problems early, or provide the documentation and paper trail to take legal or regulatory action early.


    Do a search on "Fairbanks Capital", either on the whole web, or here:

    http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/fairbanks/
     
  10. ontrack

    ontrack Well-Known Member

    The Fair Credit Billing Act requires timely statements for revolving (i.e. credit card) accounts. This allows erronious charges or fees to be visible in time for the consumer to dispute, and the bank to charge it back to the merchant if need be.

    You can choose whose CC you open an account for, but once you take out a mortgage, it could be sold to anyone, and what company services it is out of your control. Even if the service company negligently or fraudulently messes up posting, or starts forclosure, your RESPA rights may be too little-too late. You are held hostage by the lien on your house, and once your credit is damaged, you may not even be able to refinance your way out. The right to sue for damages after the fact is small compensation if the company just collapses.
     
  11. aikidokap

    aikidokap Well-Known Member

    Actually you CAN check the process.

    If you utilized the online account access instead of doing it the old fashioned way, you'd likely have access to more info than you would ever want.

    Our last three home loans have all been viewable/payable online. WE automatically pay all static bills: Home, car, trash, satellite, etc. "Paying bills" consists of entering the amounts for the variable bill in the bill pay screen and clicking send.

    Checking the online component of your major bills (mortgage, auto, insurance) takes all of 5 minutes after you send the bills.

    My wife does this process twice a month while sitting at her desk. Takes about 10 minutes each time, even checking to make sure that the LAST payments went where they are supposed to.

    aiki
     
  12. cannoda

    cannoda Well-Known Member

    1. You do NOT get to pick who services your loan. They may or may not provide the capability to view your account online. In any event, you have few options to ensure that your mortgage account will be accessible online or that you will receive statements.

    2. Being able to check your payment with yahoo, your bank, or other online bill payer service only tells you what was paid. IT DOES NOT TELL YOU IF OR HOW YOUR PAYMENT WAS APPLIED TO YOUR ACCOUNT. It is entirely possible to discover ten years after the fact that years of payments were misapplied. Compounding the problem of fixing it is the fact that your mortgage could have been re-sold or serviced by multiple servicers before you discover the problem.

    With a utility bill or a credit card, you will get a statement showing how this was applied, normally monthly. Imagine trying to prove you paid $100 extra on a credit card 10 years ago without statements. It's a crapshoot as far as whether your bank could produce a copy of a check or other records that old.

    Now consider how the problem is compounded by a number of non-regular, varying amount, additional payments to principal over several years.

    There has been a lot of fraud in the mortgage servicing industry. Requiring a statement or online access to the account is the most efficient way to deal with servicer errors and fraud.

    For real life examples of mortgage servicing fraud, do a search on "fairbanks capital" or look at the "mortgage servicing fraud" group on Yahoo.
     
  13. Hedwig

    Hedwig Well-Known Member

    I agree with aikidokap. i haven't seen a paper statement or payment book for years, except the annual required statements for escrow analysis and the annual 1098 (which gives interest paid, taxes, insurance, etc.) I check my checking account regularly and make sure the payment come out, then when I want I can go to the mortgage company site and check it all out.

    If your servicer doesn't provide this service, then I think you should be able to receive a statement. But I don't think EVERY mortgage company should be REQUIRED to send a monthly statement to everyone. If they do, expect a rise in interest rates. What you are asking for is not inconsequential or inexpensive.

    I have way too much paper in my house now.
     
  14. cannoda

    cannoda Well-Known Member

    I think we're largely in agreement. But I want to reiterate - nothing REQUIRES a mortgage servicer to provide a statement or online access to your account. Many mortgage servicers neither send a statement nor provide online access.

    Good luck sorting out who's at fault if a payment is misapplied and your loan changes hands or the servicer changes once ar twice before you receive your annual statement. And you could in up in default and possible foreclosure due to account posting errors long before you receive your 1098 and escrow statement. People have lost their homes (do the searches I indicated above, as well as the ripoff-report site) because of posting errors they didn't find out about until too late.

    In terms of the costs not being inconsequential or inexpensive, I respectfully disagree. We're not talking about a $10 payment on a credit card bill, we're talking about loans in the tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars. My current servicer, as do many others, provides both statements AND online account access. If the costs were that significant, nobody would do it without being forced to.
     
  15. deniserich

    deniserich Banned

    Thank you for your responses and I appreciate the debate. You are so right about what happens when the servicing of our loans fall into other entitys. If you haven't seen Richardson V fleet, et al than you should. It all began by paying additional principal payments which is my right to do in order to pay less interest over the course of the loan. However, their bookeeping errors grew to the magnitude where nobody could figure out the actual amount due.

    I had all the cancelled checks (Which we now no longer get with our statements) and each time the payment history statement I ordered came in, my payments I made early (i.e a Feb. 1st payt. paid on Jan. 23rd) were applied in many instances as a late payment for JAN. with a late charge applied to my balance. What this meant was each month, I was paying higher interest than I should...AND the amount due to go to principal from my payment was applied as a late payment so therefore...NO principal was being applied whatsoever.

    Had I not discovered this, the term of my loan would not only be extended (without my knowledge) but I was paying much more interest than I should have, simply due to their seriously flawed system of bookeeping.

    Eventually, due to their inability to carry out their duty to pay my mortgage, several years of battling had to take place. Then they paid off my mortgage and in settlement, agreed it was their errors and they would never adversely affect my credit. The bank was known as Shawmut Bank then.

    Incredibly 11 months later after the loan was paid and discharged. I received a call from the NEW bank (Fleet) whom they had merged with telling me they were foreclosing as I hadn't paid my mortgage.

    After numerous letters, testifying in Boston in support of monthly statements and letters received all promising me they were "fixing" the adverse "mortgage write-offs placed erroneously and in bank error on my credit...I was contacted by a collection company that they had sold this non-existent debt to. That is when I initiated the Federal suit, but only after years of exhaustive attempts to get my credit repaired which was destroyed by their ongoing errors.

    I only relay all this to you so that you can see the importance of monthly statements to those of us who like to take advantage of our no pre-payment penalty loans by paying additional principal, and those of us who KNOW first hand that bookkeeping errors do happen and CAN grow to a magnidute that you would never understand unless you have seen it with your own eyes.

    Additionally, it isn't just the additional principal that we need to worry about. What about being charged late payments when your payment isn't late...what about addtional principal payments either being applied as paid in advance (as mine were) or placed in escrow where you don't get the benefit of earned interest credits?

    I understand that you don't want the additional "paper" but you could opt out of the monthly statements and allow the people that want them their right to verify. Not everyone has a computer and not everyone trusts doing banking on line. Those people should be allowed to receive "receipts" aknowleding where there money went without being a non-paid employee and contstantly checking their "work".

    HUD not long ago estimated that over 1.5 Billion dollars had to be returned to cunsumers due to mismanaged escrow payments! That is why they now mandate lenders disclose to their consumers how much they are holding in escrow. If escrow payments were mishandled to the tune of 1.5 BILLION dollars, can't you believe there are other mishandled monies? Who else do we pay that kind of money to and not expect proof or a checks and balance system. That's all were asking for. The lenders corporations are enormous and constantly merge...they all have a net worth more than you can ever imagine. They can afford monthly statements.

    If they can afford them in MA, where they voluntarily agreed to send their consumers monthly statements after hearing from the banking committe of their enormous concern for their continual bookkeeping errors, then they can offer us the right to verify through monthly statements, if we wish, in all states. They just didn't offer to voluntarily send monthly statements, until the heat was on them. No interest rates were increased due to monthly statements being offered as you suggested.

    I support your right to opt out and verify monthly on your computer as to where your payments go. I also support your right NOT to pay additional principal payments. I am just asking for your support in our right to verify how our payments are being applied.

    Those of you that do support this effort, please take a moment to sign the petition.
    You can find it at http://www.ipetitions.com/campaigns/monthlystatements/

    or just go to http://www.consumercity.org and click on Ban Coupon Books.


    Thanks... Denise
     
  16. ontrack

    ontrack Well-Known Member

    Companies are required to send statements for revolving accounts (credit cards) under the FCBA, with far lower amounts involved than mortgages. Cost is not a legitimate issue.

    Competent loan servicers acting in good faith are not the problem. Regulatory and legal protections must be designed for the failures of the system, not for when it works. The active market in reselling existing mortgages, combined with the number of financial company mergers, both at rates that may result in several changes of loan ownership or servicing over the life of a 30 year mortgage, as well as the active market in old or bad debt, lead to the need to standardize the timely accounting for loan payments. "Conforming" loan standards helped create these markets, by allowing the easier determination of a current value for loans secured by varied properties. The uncertainty in value possible from invisible accounting errors undermines the security of not only the homeowner/borrower, but also of the holders of portfolios of loans. Conformance with standards for statements would not only catch errors early, but increase the quality of the financial information underlying lenders own financial statements.

    In effect, loan assets without monthly statements are poorly audited. Publicly traded companies carrying such loans on their books should consider compliance and auditing requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
     
  17. deniserich

    deniserich Banned

    ontrack....I could not have said it better!! Thanks!!!
     
  18. deniserich

    deniserich Banned

    ontrack..thank you for providing the link to the FTC site. The Fairbanks complaint speaks VOLUMES to what I have been saying. The consumers were not and are not aware that this happens. Now Fairbanks is paying back 40 million dollars to consumers...do people really believe they are the only lender with this type of either bookkeeping negligence or illegal activity (as the FTC put it) or the only ones tacking on charges that consumers are not aware of? I think that everyone that does not get a monthly mortgage statement reflecting how their payments are applied....needs to read this case before they can come to a conclusion that we don't need to verify how our payments are handled!!
     
  19. ontrack

    ontrack Well-Known Member

    Another interesting problem case is "Ocwen". Punch that into an internet search engine.

    The problem with systematic screw-ups, whether negligent or deliberate, is that even when the dust settles and the courts or regulatory agencies start to clean up the mess, the damage is already done, and may not be reversible. Court judgements seldom compensate for the full damages, including both the financial drain and effects on people's lives, even if they are won. The offending company may not even have the resources to pay off, as with Enron, or the various S&L collapses of the early 90s.
     
  20. deniserich

    deniserich Banned

Share This Page