You posted this stuff. Now people are telling you to be careful, which is very good advice whether you want to hear it or not. If you don't want to hear it, don't post these type of things. And if you do post these type of things, don't be a jerk about it when you do get GOOD advice.
New File...Paid $200 4book!!!? KG | 8 posts since Aug 2002 198.81.26.175 | 09.24.2002 @ 08:32 Do you know if this stuff ever back fires? What do you think board? thank you again , kev Here in your original 9/24 post you're asking for advice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: New File...Paid $200 4book!!!? KG | 8 posts since Aug 2002 198.81.26.175 | 09.25.2002 @ 06:07 thanks for the unwanted advise. Today 9/25 you say you don't want advice . ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Make up your mind man -get real! LB 59
So because you are not hearing want you want to hear it is unwanted advise? Because people are telling you what's right and wrong and to please refrain from doing anything that could get yourself into legal trouble? Because people are trying to guide you to correct your mistakes from the experience of all here on the board? Because you paid $200 for a book that you think is valuable and yet this information is found FREE if you simply search for it here on the internet, this board, and the library? The solution to your unwanted advise is this: DO NOT ASK FOR ADVISE HERE BECAUSE YOU WILL GET IT (sorry for all caps George)!
PSST. Don't admint that you have done anything even questionably illegal in a public forum. If you don't think folks are watching, big brother, yadda. If you think the internet is anonymous, you are dead butt wrong. Everything you say leaves a trail right back to where ever you are sitting now. Ask me how, i've worked at isp's. I've been served papers to disclose log files containing who did what from where. It's not pretty. Actually sometimes its pretty funny what people do (ex's hacking into other ex's computer/websites). but the bottom line is that some things should not be said unless you want them to come back on you some day..
My goodness, why even ask for advice if you can take what is given to you. I am a newbie myself, well not that new, I read more than I post, but these members in the group WILL NOT stir you wrong. I am very disappointed in your comment......Why can't people be NICE all the time......CreditNet I am with you, YOU all have help me deleted 6 bad accounts on my credit with 6 left to go......so I thank you.....Positive advice to you all after this negative one....Keep your heads up and your fingers typing...ONE!
Re: The Piggy-back method..... _______________________________________________ Also I am so very happy that the creditnetters here do not have the same attitude of NOT giving out "Free Information" I for one would be in a heck of a fix if they all felt this way! If it were me I would step back and take a very long and hard look before going any further with the plan laid out in your valuable Ebook. Just my thoughts. Tuit
Re: The Piggy-back method..... That's the sound of the men...working on the chain ga--ang, That's the sound of the men working on the chain, gang...all day long they work so hard......
Re: The Piggy-back method..... Amen to that. I am reading this thread with some amusement. Attitude is eberything. We create our own environment. No doubt this individual finds the world a hostile place.
This would be considered asking for advice and thats what you got. And its excellent advice, for free! From the FTC web page: The problem: "File segregation" is illegal. If you use it, you could face fines or even a prison sentence. What more do you need to know?
Re: The Piggy-back method..... No one was trying to criticize you. Everyone was trying to help you stay out of legal trouble and maybe even jail. You didn't even know enough to know that this information that you paid $200.00 for was free just for the asking, but yet you feel creditnetters ignorantly criticize. If you had of come to this board before you bought your "free information" we could have ignorantly criticized you to save your money. Maybe that's why you are pissed off because you put your hard earned money in someone elses pocket. BTW, if you think that $200 is a lot of money (not just for the book but period) then you've got bigger problems than you think. (now this is a criticism)
Re: The Piggy-back method..... Thank you very, very much for the information board, I believe I have enough to go on......I had an attorney friend take a look and it is a fine line between love and hate......Thanks again....if someone needs help. We can maybe chat further in a room one-on-one?? Thanks, kev (I'm the same kev from 2yrs back , I had to update my system and couldn't get in)
Re: The Piggy-back method..... Again, if this info. is legit., why don't you share it with everyone on the board? why the need for secrecy? i'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. Since you're the Kev from back in the day, i'm sure you remember when everyone said Lizardking could not win in Small Claims Court. Now everyone on the board easily uses that tactic to erase deletions. If everyone else is wrong, the best way to shut them up is to show how it works. Don't you agree? humblemarc
yeah well, what did your attorney have to say? You showed him your book? Sassy Editing: kev = BKev???????
