Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by ru4real, Sep 9, 2003.
Do you think I have them on another violation?
Barclaycard Ring™ Mastercard®
No annual fee, No balance transfer fees, No foreign transaction fees, Low interest!
CREDIT CARD WITH NO ANNUAL FEEBarclaycard Ring™ Mastercard®
Credit One Unsecured Visa®for Rebuilding Credit
Credit card for people with bad credit to rebuild credit!
BAD CREDIT CREDIT CARDCredit One Bank® Rebuild Credit
First Access VISA® Credit Card
Access to credit even with bad or limited credit! Reports to 3 major credit bureaus and accepted wherever you see the Visa® sign. Get application response in 60 seconds.
CREDIT CARD FOR BAD CREDITFirst Access VISA®
Green Dot primor® Visa®Classic Secured Credit Card
Credit lines available up to $5,000! Reports to three national credit bureaus; perfect card for reestablishing credit. Guaranteed approval*!
SECURED CARD FOR REBUILDING CREDITprimor Secured Visa Classic
Credit One Bank® Unsecured Visa® with Cash Back Rewards
Get cash back on every purchase. Unsecured credit card with monthly monitoring for credit line increases. Improve your credit history with responsible use.
CASH BACK UNSECURED VISACredit One Bank
Account closed? Do you owe them money? Need details.
Account is open, and I do not owe them money...
Oops, revolving (open end) or a closed end installment type loan?
Then its a bit dicey. If you have an open account like that, your creditor is allowed to pull your credit report. But I agree - its fishy.
Here is my take on your situation. The issue in Greenblatt is somewhat different in that the brokerage firm obtained the CR for the stated purpose of crafting settlement offers in response to pending litigation. This stated purpose is not found under FCRA 604 and therefore the FTC Staff Attorney correctly opined that the brokerage firm did not have PP for obtaining the CR for that specific use. The brokerage firm would have a PP under 604(a)(3)(F) to obtain a CR if someone applies to open an account, or thereafter to determine whether to discontinue doing business with an established client. However, if the brokerage firm misrepresents to the CRA that it is obtaining the CR pursuant to 604(a)(3)(F) and instead uses the CR in connection with settlements and pending litigation, then it has violated the FCRA.
In your case, I think the key is to establish in writing the reason why the company pulled your CR. This would not be a violation unless you have evidence that they pulled your CR in response to your lawsuit or that they somehow used the CR in connection with the lawsuit.
Write them a letter asking them why they pulled your CR. If they state in writing that it had any connection with your lawsuit, then you have them on a clear violation with written evidence to prove it. However, if they say that they are simply reviewing your open revolving account with them, then you have no violation (because FCRA 604(a)(3)(F) allows them to legally do that). If they do not respond, then you have no written proof that a violation has occurred.
Also, watch carefully to see if they use or reference either of the two CR (on the dates of the soft inquiries) in any manner connected with your lawsuit. If they do, then you could argue that they misrepresented to the CRA their PP for pulling your CR and that they used them for a non-permissible purpose. Finally, you have the option of suing them in small claims for the soft inquiries (which potentially could be worth $2000). However, you would still have the burden to prove that there was no PP, which could be difficult if the judge sees that you had an open account with them and without having evidence that somehow ties it directly to the lawsuit.
The key is that you need some type of hard evidence that they obtained and/or used your CR in connection with the lawsuit in order to prove that a violation has occurred. Just my opinion.