PLEASE PLEASE help! Reaged!

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by ScoreBGood, Aug 27, 2002.

  1. ScoreBGood

    ScoreBGood Active Member

    I am trying to repair both mine and hubbys reports so on a Collection account that I was just an authorized user I disputed WELL they sent a letter to us about 3 days after I sent in my online dispute. Okay this is an old account from Spiegal I am trying to locate dates .....

    Anyhow now on my hubby's TU report the CA Midland Credit says it was placed 6/2002

    this is NOT TRUE ...it is several years old

    How do I dispute this??? I want to do it online if at all possible....maybe select other and tell them this is inaccurate info???
     
  2. vanili

    vanili Well-Known Member

    huh???
     
  3. sal826

    sal826 Well-Known Member

    Do you have another credit report with a different date - If you have this, you can then complain to the CRA and the collection agency. Chances are (depending on the tone of your letters) they will probably delete the whole trade line.


    -Sal
     
  4. ScoreBGood

    ScoreBGood Active Member

    This account is in Collections...just found the dates from Experian report. On Experian it is listed as
    FCNB/SPIEGL/EBAUR/NW

    Account History:
    Charge Off as of 10-1997
    180 days as of 10-1997, 9-1997
    150 days as of 8-1997
    120 days as of 7-1997
    90 days as of 6-1997
    60 days as of 5-1997
    30 days as of 4-1997, 1997, 7-1996, 3-1996

    and listed as Collection

    MIDLAND CREDIT MGMT
    Original Creditor:
    FCNB/SPIEGEL

    Status:
    Collection account. $795 past due as of 8-2002.

    Account History:
    Collection as of 8-2002, 7-2002, 5-1997


    And they are reporting it on TU as

    FCNB Status 10/97 Charged off as bad debt

    AND as collection

    Midland Credit
    FCNB Spiegal

    Updated 7/2002
    Placed 6/2002

    Status as of 7/2002 Collection account



    Any ideas how to dispute on TU that it was not just placed in 6/2002??
     
  5. vanili

    vanili Well-Known Member

    Ok...I think I now understand. I too am still confused about the reaging thing...but wouldn't it be accurate if Midland CA is reporting it as placed in june since that is maybe when they acquired the debt? However, wouldn't the DOLA have to be the date of last delinquency? Isn't the DOLA different that the date placed?
     
  6. Harpsong

    Harpsong Well-Known Member

    I don't believe that it is showing as reaged. Placed there refers to when that CA placed the account information on the report, not your DOLA.
     
  7. ScoreBGood

    ScoreBGood Active Member

    So even though it's a separate entry and showing placed on 6/2002 they will see it as the same account? The earliest history date is 1997

    One more question...how do you all dispute paid/charged off accounts? By the amount? Since I did pay Or what about Paid in Settlement?

    Thanks so much! I have so so much to learn.
     

Share This Page