Just a thought. Has anyone tried including a procedural request in with a dispute to the CRA (I've read post after post of a CSR with the CRA telling someone that they dispose of the information on how they verified the tradeline after they mark it verified and so can't tell you who validated it, and what the method of validation was. I was thinking of something like this: If the account is validated, please return the following form in the enclosed self addressed stamped envelope. ----------------- NEW PAGE ---------------------- Procedural of Validation: Account # 0000000000000000 with XYZ Collection Agency Method of contact to verify (circle one) Phone Fax E-Mail Postal Mail If validation by phone, date of call and name of person at XYZ Collection Agency tradeline was validated through: ____________________ ______________ Name Date If validation by Fax, Postal Mail, or E-Mail enclose a copy of the Fax, E-Mail Message, or letter.
emmmmmmmm might not be a bad idea what does doc think about this or someone who has more experience here would be better to answer that one but I think it could be a good Idea
I tried that with EXP and they kept sending me a letter that they already investigated it. After 3 letters I sent them an intent to sue. They did a reinvestigation and verified it again. I think it's lawsuit time and get them to settle for deletion.
