Professional Collections Adamant

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by dxbguy, Jun 15, 2003.

  1. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    If you have the bills,
    prafces
    ==================
    IF he has the bills why does he need the CA to send him the bills?
     
  2. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    enlisting the cooperation of the CA or CRA instead of taking an adversarial approach.
    Mycroft
    ==============
    One thing I have learned in 2 years reading the board is CAs are very cooperative and non adversarial. LOL
    THE END ** *** ** LB 59
    """""""""```~~~```'"""""""""
     
  3. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    The assignment or purchase agreement for the alleged debt between Professional Collections and Sprint."
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1*Never did understand this one in the sample letter forum.
    2*If they get copies of the original bills from Sprint, wouldn't that be enough evidence in court that they do have an agreement to collect?
    jlynn
    ================
    1*This is to protect you from getting into a situation that results in paying the debt twice.
    2*I can see cases where it might not be.
     
  4. jlynn

    jlynn Well-Known Member

    Maybe you misunderstood. Wouldn't the CA sending you copies of the originals from the OC being self-proof that they have an agreement to collect?
     
  5. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Professional Collections Adamant

    How is that two different violations? I mean sending the same thing agian for the second time is a violation?
    dxbguy

    If they are asking for money each time it's 2 violations.

    THE END ** *** ** LB 59
    """""""""```~~~```'
     
  6. jlynn

    jlynn Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: Professional Collections Adamant

    LB - I'm not being ornery, I'm just having a hard time with this. If they BELIEVE they validated, then sending a payment envelope isn't a violation. I'm thinking about it from the point of view that I am going to court...not trying to scare them into submission.

    (c) A debt collector may not be held liable in any action brought under this title if the debt collector shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such error.
     
  7. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Wrong place

    """""""""```~~~```'"""""""""
     
  8. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Professional Collections Adamant

    2*I can see cases where it might not be. What if the agreement had been terminated returned to the OC or sold to another CA and the first CA still had copies of the original bills?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



     
  9. jlynn

    jlynn Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: Professional Collections Adamant

    Excellent point.
     

Share This Page