Ready to Tackle CR

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by d-angelo, Apr 22, 2005.

  1. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    Hello All, this is a great board! I think I am ready to tackle my credit score, and I know your insight will make this less painful. I have a bank loan that has been paid in full, but has two 30 days late tradelines. I have a wireless charged off debt for $140, and I just received a letter from a new CA that took it over. Both of these are 4 years old. Also I donâ??t know if I should have done it gradually or not, but I recently (yesterday) paid up all revolving accts. so that the balances are less than 30% of the limit. My goal is to remove any negative tradeline data. Also I recently closed a CC, because it cost too much annually. I had it for like 4 years, but my other credit cards I have had longer. I have several lost/stolen cards tradelines and different addresses (college). I have been paying everything on time, and my student loans are consolidated and in forebearance. What is your opinion on my first move, goodwill? Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jenz123

    jenz123 Well-Known Member

    i would do the ol' "1-2" punch
     
  3. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    1-2 punch?...please elaborate!!
     
  4. jenz123

    jenz123 Well-Known Member

    1. send DV letter to CA via CMRRR
    2. once you get green card back in mail, send dispute to CRA via CMRRR
    3. CA cannot legally continue collection activity until the debt is proven and verifying with the CRA is considered collection activity. your goal of this is that it will take longer than 30 days to prove the debt, therefore the CRA will have no choice but to delete.

    does that help or did i make it worse?
     
  5. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    Thank you, I'll start and keep you posted. Also for the CA DV, is there a sample for CA's?
     
  6. jenz123

    jenz123 Well-Known Member

    have you checked the sample letter forum?
     
  7. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    No, but I will right now...Thanks again.
     
  8. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    These samples seem to be very forward. The first vd letter I will be sending the CA, is for a legit debt (that the cellular company -OC ) would not see things my way on. My goal, is for this vd to remain in limbo during the 1-2 punch. Should I not send a nicer vd, like Psych-doc suggests in other posts...or should I send a demanding letter, and which one?

    Thanks again for your assistance :)
     
  9. jenz123

    jenz123 Well-Known Member

    you should use whatever works best for what you are trying to accomplish.

    FWIW - on a friends report they had a legit cell collection (AT&T WIRELESS) and they weren't able to validate. they eventually did but it never got reinserted.
     
  10. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    Thanks, again I'll keep you posted.
     
  11. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    I received all of my credit reports and I will post them later today. Surprisingly, the wireless debt is not on any of the reports, but remember I just received a CA letter for this debt which was charged off. The CA letter read that they are taking over this account. Is the 1-2 punch still the best attack, since it is not on my CR's? I have alot of "lost card tradelines, is this a negative as well on my score?

    I will post by adverse accounts later this afternoon, from my CR's.

    Thanks in Advance :)
     
  12. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    My wireless is not on my CR, there are several â??lost/stolensâ?, and all accounts show where I have exceeded at one point the credit limit (even those in good standing). I also have my previous addresses on the CRâ??s. All accounts chave removal dates of around 2008, and my inquiries are EQ-7, TU-6, EX-3. Everything else is listed as positive. Also, does the lost/stolen tagline hurt and what should be my course of attack? As always thank you in advance. (Let Me At 'EM!!! RRRRR)

    Bank A Loan 1
    Ex: paid, closed/past 30 days
    Tu: same-deposit related
    EQ: same-deposit related

    Bank A Loan 2
    Ex: paid,closed/past 2-60, 2-30
    Tu: Past 2-30dy, 1-60dy (tradeline remark-max deliquincy)
    EQ: Past 2-30dy, 2-60dy

    Bank Credit Card (MC)
    Ex: Past 1-30dy in 2002, lost/stolen

    Same Bank Credit Card (MC)
    Ex: Past 1-60dy, 2-30dy, lost/stolen
    Tu: Past 1-60dy, 2-30dy lost/stolen (acct number is different though)
    Not on EQ as past due, only lost and stolen

    Direct Loan (School)
    Tu: 1-60dy, 1-90dy (trade line remark says max delinquency) (pay status-unrated)
    Ex: paid as agreed-deferred
     
  13. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    BUMP
     
  14. pd11604

    pd11604 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Ready to Tackle CR

    YES, you want to send the validation letter to the CA as soon as possible...once they receive it they cannot legally take any further collection action until they provide validation
    If they put a TL on your CR's without validating they have violated the FDCPA for which you may collect 1000$ if you sue
     
  15. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    Re: Re: Ready to Tackle CR

    Thanks again for the prompt response, any info on how to attack my CR.
     
  16. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    Re: Re: Ready to Tackle CR

    On my credit cards that are reported late on my CR, I called the company and they said they can only see back 2 years, and I have paid as agreed. Should I directly dispute the CRA as never late?
     
  17. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    Re: Re: Ready to Tackle CR

    bump
     
  18. jenz123

    jenz123 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: Ready to Tackle CR

    Yes just dispute as never late.
     
  19. d-angelo

    d-angelo Active Member

    Re: Re: Re: Ready to Tackle CR

    Thank you, I hope all is gradually going in the right direction for you Jenz!
     

Share This Page