repo question

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by patentatty, Mar 17, 2003.

  1. patentatty

    patentatty Well-Known Member

    Actually I have 2 (somewhat interesting) questions:

    1- What happens if a bank is unable to locate the vehicle? What do they have to do legally to force a customer to return the car?

    2- I've heard that MOST states allow for deficiency judgements on vehicles. Does anyone know which states DON'T allow for deficiency judgements on vehicles?
     
  2. patentatty

    patentatty Well-Known Member

    bump
     
  3. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    GOOD Q
     
  4. SDBoy

    SDBoy Well-Known Member

    If the bank cannot find the car, you get stuck with repo fees anyway as the repo guy charges the bank for looking.

    If they hold the note and you the loan, then they can request the car back in writing, then you HAVE to return it or it's grand theft in almost every state in the nation.

    Either return it or pucker that cornhole up for a stint in the state hotel.
     
  5. patentatty

    patentatty Well-Known Member

    Despite that eloquent and in-depth legal analysis, I have to disagree. I'm pretty sure the procedure I'm thinking of is an equitable action for replevin, which, I think, usually requires the creditor to post a bond prior to proceeding. Does anyone have experience using replevin as a means of recovering UCC Art 9 secured property? Also, I'd still like to know which states are the exceptions in terms of deficiency judgements.

    TIA,

    -M-
     
  6. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    What 's needed is to ban repos.
     
  7. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    repo question
    ====================
    What legal requirements must the creditor meet in order to be allowed to repossess?

    The END ************************* LB 59
     
  8. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: repo question

    What legal requirements must the creditor meet in order to be allowed to repossess?
     
  9. bigmon

    bigmon Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: repo question

    I know of people that have hid cars for years and the creditor stops looking.

    Since your credit is gonna be messed up you can always part the car out and give the bank the rest.
     
  10. patentatty

    patentatty Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: repo question

    Sorry I had to laugh after reading that last one. I can just imagine the bank getting a writ of replevin ordering you to return the car and then you either have to explain where everything but the frame went or go to jail for contempt. I've heard a lot of times, the parts sold separately can be worth twice the value of the car, so it's an interesting idea, I'd just hate to end up having to explain to a judge what happened to it.
     
  11. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: repo question

    What criteria do they have to meet in order to get that?

    The END ************************* LB 59

     
  12. patentatty

    patentatty Well-Known Member

  13. tac14033

    tac14033 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: repo question

    It would not be grand theft if you didn't return the car, it would be a civil matter, not criminal left up to a judge to decide.

    It is default of a contract for which you are failing to adhere to such and that includes returning the car when asked by them. Unless it has a judge's order stamped, their letter is baseless and useless in getting their car back if they demand it.

    The only law that I am aware of in PA anyway and I might also add besides fixing credit I am a Police Officer, is theft of leased property.

    If you are leasing a car and do not return it or hide it then you can and will be arrested.

    Tac
     
  14. patentatty

    patentatty Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: repo question

    Good I was hoping you'd chime in actually - I mean, the car is yours, their lien is just a restraint on your ability to transfer the title. The only way I think you could get in trouble for failing to return it when asked to is if they had gone to court to ask the judge to find you in default on the contract, he did and issued the writ of replevin and then you failed to return the car. Then, you'd have contempt of court problems, but even there, let's say you weren't notified of the judge's order (you had moved to another state, etc). I think someone skilled at keeping their address off of their credit report could probably dodge a bank for a long time.
     
  15. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: Re: repo question

    1*the purchaser must be in default.
    2*The sheriff turns the vehicle over to the creditor, but it cannot be sold until the creditor has won a judgment on the underlying installment contract.
    patentatty
    ==================
    1*And just who determines this ?
    2*And what happens if the creditor don't win a jugment ? The car owner is still screwed out of the use his car.

    The END ************************* LB 59
     

Share This Page