Both times got printout of bills and/or meter readings. I have them on verifying during validation, and not reporting in dispute (which they promptly did as soon as they received the estoppel--so I'm not sure that still counts--I can prove it was done AFTER they signed for estoppel too) What's next? Another letter or intent to sue? also, the bill has my husbands SSN# on it, if that makes a difference--and it's an unpaid collection, for $65.
AAARRGGG - Tracy moved her thread. LOL Reference: http://consumers.creditnet.com/straighttalk/board/showthread.php?s=&postid=239367#post239367 It's real tuff to prove when they alerted the CRA that the account was disputed. I have one CA now who says: "we alerted them in a timely manner but we have no control over when they put it on the report". DAMN It's true - they don't! That means somebodies lying. I think I will be filing against BOTH and let them explain it to the Judge. It's about the only way I can think of.
I agree with Butch! Sue them both. I am sure one will settle with a little money thrown it. Did you send your estoppel after 30 days? if so, how did you change the wording of your letters? humblemarc
