Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by newbie, Apr 3, 2001.
Barclaycard Ring™ Mastercard®
No annual fee, No balance transfer fees, No foreign transaction fees, Low interest!
CREDIT CARD WITH NO ANNUAL FEEBarclaycard Ring™ Mastercard®
Credit One Unsecured Visa®for Rebuilding Credit
Credit card for people with bad credit to rebuild credit!
BAD CREDIT CREDIT CARDCredit One Bank® Rebuild Credit
First Access VISA® Credit Card
Access to credit even with bad or limited credit! Reports to 3 major credit bureaus and accepted wherever you see the Visa® sign. Get application response in 60 seconds.
CREDIT CARD FOR BAD CREDITFirst Access VISA®
Green Dot primor® Visa®Classic Secured Credit Card
Credit lines available up to $5,000! Reports to three national credit bureaus; perfect card for reestablishing credit.
SECURED CARD FOR REBUILDING CREDITprimor Secured Visa Classic
Credit One Bank® Unsecured Visa® with Cash Back Rewards
Get cash back on every purchase. Unsecured credit card with monthly monitoring for credit line increases. Improve your credit history with responsible use.
CASH BACK UNSECURED VISACredit One Bank
The amount owed is about $2600; they are offering $1600. I made the mistake of not disputing it or challenging it. I wrote them a letter saying that I would accept their offer if they would delete the listing, but they won't budge. I tried again, and they say that's the best they can do. I goofed, didn't I? Oops, I'm new at this! Would this be something Junum can help me negotiate? I just don't seem to be good at it.
If you do nothing, there's no doubt they'll place a collection entry on your report sooner or later.
Paying the collector w/o deletion is your worst option. In fact it's not an option at all, because you'd be spending money, and get a very negative credit mark in return.
One way to avoid a collection entry (or easily remove one) is to pay the original creditor (Associates) in full. They won't talk to you directly, fine. But they may very well cash a check, if you send them one (of course you'd have to write your Associates account # on the check). What good would this do?
1. It would stop all collection activity.
2. It would prevent placing a collection entry on your report.
3. You would avoid the risk of having the original account rated R9.
4. An account paid in full is usually much easier to remove by way of disputing.
I had a charged off account with Associates for $88 (I know it's a huge
difference). I paid in full last summer, and in November I called the
department that reports information to the credit bureau. It took a lot
of work but I finally tracked it down.
The rep I spoke with is named Debbie (the only Debbie there) and she told
me to fax in proof of my name, address, account number and social security
number and that department would have it deleted.
Some notes: I did pay in full, even though ANB offered me a settlement, but
of course the amount was very small.
I got the feeling ANB does this regularly, since Debbie said that anyone in her
dept. would delete my entry.
I don't have that department's phone number now, but I will try to get it
tomorrow. It's the dept. with Associates (not Citibank) that reports to the
CRAs. Again, the amounts are significantly different, so I can't say that
it will work. But it doesn't hurt to try.
Feel free to e-mail me to remind me to get the number, if you want to.
"But Saar, is it worth paying in full? $2600 is an in full payment, versus the offer of $1000."
And how would that offer benefit him or make his credit situation any better? The Associates account would show R9 and the delinq. section would show a settled collection.
"Frankly, since I am just the bastard that I am, I would ignore it until it is in charge-off status. Then have that money to hire Junum or Lexington."
And who's to say they'd be able to remove an unpaid/ settled collection as well as the "R9" account? This could irrevocably trash his credit for years. Whereas if he paid Associates now, his account would show R1. Once paid off, he may even be able to remove the "late pay" notation and keep the "R1" account. And he would certainly have much better leverage when he calls this Debbie, who may actually do it FOR him.
Re: A few ideas
Another option would be to pay $1000, get it in writing that that is paid in full. Wait a few weeks and then send them a validation type letter and request proof of the reported account belonging to you in the first place. After sending those letters, dispute with the CRA's all at the same time, to have the entry removed. This has worked for a few people I know. I don't have this letter in front of me but I know someone who has a contract, which is used for the sale of bad debt to a collection company. What this contract does is keep the seller of a debt from ever talking about the account again. I know you are able to use this when money is exchanged.
Which reminds me that when creditors claim they will not delete the entry you can always offer to buy the account and using one of those contracts, you would then be the only person who is able to report anything to the CRA's in regards to the account. This is what all debt service companies do once they have purchased a bad debt. Sometimes disputes don't come back answered or they take a while because the CRA's will send a transmission to the original creditor and the original creditor can only forward that request to the new debt owner and can not talk about the account with the CRA's or anyone.
Re: A few ideas
"I thought that once a collection agency has it, the account is closed. If they are talking settlement of 60%, I doubt they will let him keep his charging ability and report it as R1."
That's exactly the point! Ignore the settlement offer made by the collector and pay the original creditor in full. He said they didn't close the account yet. If he pays, they must re-rate it R1.
Re: A few ideas
An account can stay open up to 120 days past due. After that a bank has to right it off as a charge-off.
Re: A few ideas
That is plain wrong, and I'd be happy to see a legal reference that can support your statement.
Re: A few ideas