Re: Re: Re: Re: Should I bother? I bet if you were 30 days past due it would reappear on your credit reports like magic.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Should I bother? Actually you said: I just condensed it down into an easier to digest form.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Should I bother? You never know what they will do next. It's a guessing game. Like why does one report leave an account that you dispute and a different CRA deletes? Who knows? Toothfairy ================== No one swhould be ripped off with higher prices because of such whimseness. Matter of fact no one should be riped off with higher prices period. The END ************************* LB 59
Re: Re: Re: Re: Should I bother? This is a great thread. Two things can be addressed. First, the CRA's have a vested financial interest in keeping your scores lower. If you've seen my post on the Rule Of 72, it's easy to see why even a small drop in your score yields higher interest rates to the advantage of the creditor, to whom the CRA's are most loyal. For example the difference Butch ====================== Good post Butch. It don't take an Einstein to realize the whole deal is a legalized con game. Also it doesn't take a genius to see that the only way to prevent or at least greatly reduce getting caught up in the scam is to avoid getting involved with it as much as possible. Even this isn't foolproof as you can still become a victim through no-fault of your own or participation on your part. Like my tag line say They can screw you instantly without any effort on your part whatsoever. The END ************************* LB 59
