Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Get "Evidence of failure to deny statements of others is admissible only when no other explanation is equally consistent with silence." U.S. v. Gross, 276 F.2d 816 (1960).
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Get Well trent, Though you specifically asked Butch, I'm taking his last post to mean he's not answering, so I'll tell you what I think. You've presently 3 letters out to TU, all with different demands and deadlines, and overlapping each other. Breath, and wait out the timeframes in those letters before doing anything else. And importantly, you made the decision to send your last fax to TU based on the advice of one person, without ever considering any consequences of that action, nor without any sources or verification on the information. Please trent, solicit input and direction, bump your thread until you get enough information that you can both verify and confirm, and then make the best decision you can. This is a public message board, with known trolls, CA's, eyes of the CRA's, mean-spirited people and honest good-intended people -- all people just the same who may or may not be recommending you do something that is in your best interest. It may be well-intended advice that could well hurt you. The decision to follow it though, the consequences, and results from having done so though, are only yours. I know of at least one member on this board, who was the victim of fraud and extortion, her case was indeed initially "juicy" -- however, despite the advise on this board and the processes of the FCRA and FDCPA for the resolution of inaccurate information, she disregarded it all in favor of the opinion and recommendations of ONE poster, and has been living in litigational hell since then -- and her case isn't so "juicy" anymore, she had no papertrail and documentable attempted resolution to back-up her claims. The FCRA doesn't demand absolute accuracy, it says maximum possible accuracy, based on the CRA's having to follow reasonable procedures to assure it. The FDCPA allows an exception for errors. You have to have enough of a papertrail to get beyond the procedural errors that happen in business. If you don't follow the processes it allows for, you can't show they didn't follow reasonable procedures, and no matter how "juicy" your potential case -- you can't meet the findings required to get a ruling in your favor. You have both followed the processes and have a papertrail, don't be willing to sacrifice them based on anyone's postings without doing some research to confirm and verify the information and your options. Please don't succomb to email solicitations for information based on postings either -- the sharing and posting is what feeds and breeds ideas and strategies that you can then use to make good decisions on. That is where the quality of information is, in the posting and sharing, the synergy created by the whole!!!!! You've an awesome potential case, trent, a lot of people have told you the same, HEAR them!!! Sassy
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Get To insinuate that by requesting a certification that your adversary insists, and stated in writing, that they have, would "hurt" you, to insist that demanding this cert. would do anything OTHER than help your case, is ignorant, at best. LOL Other than that ... yeah ... you should get advice from several people. That part is true enough. .
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Get Butch, I insinuated nothing. Can you provide a link to confirm what you've decided is ignorance????? Deletion would help, how? Reinvestigation would help, how? Maybe a case or something that shows what is a required finding for negligance and/or wilful nocompliance and how either of those scenarios would or wouldn't hurt him? This is actually covered a few pages back, but as seems to be your mission today, in deciding what you thinked I typed and meant versus what I did type and mean, you missed the whole damn point. Sassy
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Get I guess you think I should be honored that finally gave a response that wasn't to the question. I'm not. Don't bother answering Butch. Several longtime members have clued me in on why they think you won't answer. Trent, you do have the potential for a large case here. Take all advice into consideration before listening to only one person. In fact, I would take the advice of those who have been involved in their own legal case and won, before anybody else. Did the lawyer you contacted respond?
I sent the demand to see the certification, they sent back a letter( very fast) that they could not use the information I had sent them and would check with the furnisher of the information. I have done nothing else. I received a call from an attorney on my answering machine asking me to call him to get more information on the case..I will do nothing else until I get more information. I read where someone said I had 3 different things going with 3 different deadlines. I have I letter and one fax with them at this point both saying I want it deleted and to provide procedural evidence they had verified. Am I on the right track P.S. are you a proud new minivan owner JENZ?
Since you are trying to hire a lawyer, I would suggest you do nothing further until you have spoken with the lawyer and he knows exactly what the situation is. Then he can give you the direction you really need.
LOL we didn't pick it up yet. i don't know why i am delaying - maybe its because its a MINIVAN. hows the expedition?
expo is great and oh soooo big, great car, and financing came through at 9% a little higher than I wanted but not much, I sign the papers tomorrow.The credit union said NO so went with americredit. I dont hear any thing about them so dont know how they are. I have a direct deposit account that I will use to pay them early each month
LKH Since you are trying to hire a lawyer, I would suggest you do nothing further until you have spoken with the lawyer and he knows exactly what the situation is. Then he can give you the direction you really need. Not doing anything else...waiting game and putting in the lawyers hands Thanks for the help, I appreciate it!!!!!!!!!!!!!
