stupid CA good lord

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by picantel, Aug 22, 2002.

  1. picantel

    picantel Well-Known Member

    cool that would be great to know. I was gonna file against him anyway but having the exact law or such would be a great help.
     
  2. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

    This is correct Pic,

    The demand for Val. does apply to him but NOT the 30 days time limit.

    Did you dispute with the CRA ?????

    You'll find the 30 day time limit in the FCRA
     
  3. picantel

    picantel Well-Known Member

    so if you send in a request for validation they can take all the time they feel like? He did close the account but will not remove from the credit file.
     
  4. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

  5. picantel

    picantel Well-Known Member

    Did you ever see it ttowns. Also, the CA finally caved after I sent a 5 page intent to sue notice and are sending the letter to cbc credit services(equifax) as I type this. After I lost over 40 points let us see if I gain the entire 40 back. Since then I have had 4 inquiries removed also so it should be higher. If it is not then the RNG theory has been proved.
     
  6. picantel

    picantel Well-Known Member

    yeah I got my points back.
    was 645
    ca hits and 3 inquiries drop off
    down to 603
    ca deleted
    up to 648 so I got 3 points from those 3 deleted inquiries.
    6 hard inquiries left but 3 are the same company so it only lists it as 4 hards.
     
  7. ttowns

    ttowns Well-Known Member

    http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpa/commentary.htm#813

    That's the link. It's the FTC website as you can see.

    1. Employee liability. Since the employees of a debt collection agency are "debt collectors," they are liable for violations to the same extent as the agency.

    Straight from the horse's mouth. Can't get much better than that.
     
  8. picantel

    picantel Well-Known Member

    Thanks that is great. They backed off big time but I may need soon enough.
     

Share This Page