Search results for: 63.228.52.57 OrgName: U S WEST Internet Services OrgID: USW NetRange: 63.224.0.0 - 63.231.255.255 CIDR: 63.224.0.0/13 NetName: USW-INTERACT99 NetHandle: NET-63-224-0-0-1 Parent: NET-63-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS1.USWEST.NET NameServer: NS2.DNVR.USWEST.NET Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE RegDate: 1999-06-07 Updated: 2002-08-12 TechHandle: ZU24-ARIN TechName: U S WEST ISOps TechPhone: +1-612-664-4689 TechEmail: abuse@uswest.net OrgAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Qwest IP Abuse OrgAbusePhone: +1-703-363-3001 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@qwest.net OrgNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN OrgNOCName: Qwest IP NOC OrgNOCPhone: +1-703-363-3001 OrgNOCEmail: support@qwestip.net OrgTechHandle: QIA-ARIN OrgTechName: Qwest IP Admin OrgTechPhone: +1-888-795-0420 OrgTechEmail: ipadmin@qwest.com
Since PFB seems to work so well with credit...I just PFBd a []...LOL...hoping they care enough about their service to eliminate this []
My question is...is the #63.228.52.57 only ONE person's service, or could it be a WHOLE city, or 1/4 of a city, or a neighborhood??? OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@qwest.net If they get a bunch of E-MAILS...can they PULL THE PLUG??? ...or do they just say...WE MADE MONEY...SO WHAT???
George, There is only one person at any given time with that IP Addy. Qest wont risk getting sued, they will just kill his service. -Sal
It is the IP assigned directly to him. Since it's a DSL, therefore static, It'll be easy to find out who the addy is assigned to. Radi8
That dude is the epitome of stupidity. Are collection agencies/collectors so upset they need to resort to this? This is a wonderful piece of proof we are beating them at their own games -Sal
Thank you for reporting this incident to Qwest. We are have received your report and are investigating the situation. Once we have completed our investigation, we will take appropriate action against the offending customer account. -- Qwest Internet Solutions sysop@qwest.net, abuse@qwest.net (A)cceptable (U)se (P)olicy (AUP) http://www.qwest.com/legal/usagePolicy.html Have a nice day. Radi8
Exactly!!! ------------------------------------------------------------ attn: stan aka the kid aka CA attorney aka Slick kid, You lost before because of this board, and you will continue to lose as more and more consumer's become aware of your tactics. Why don't you start doing some homework, otherwise you will soon be out of a job. (i'm bored, can we play sue the CA now!) I can't see you but i know you're out there.
I wonder how far this could go...COULD THE FCC SHUT THE CA DOWN AND REMOVE ALL THE [TROLLS] TO HEADQUARTERS FOR A LITTLE TALK??? OR FINE THEM $50,000 payable to www.creditnet.com ??? If the FCC has no authority..they could pass it along to the right agency...
