Unethical, but is it illegal?

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by QUEEN_BEE, Mar 4, 2002.

  1. QUEEN_BEE

    QUEEN_BEE Well-Known Member

    I sent a validation letter to "CA-1". They respond with a computer printout, an itemized statement with medical codes. They sent no more collection notices and never reported to the CRAs. BUT...
    I later check my credit report and see that a new CA ("CA-2") is reporting this debt. CA-2 has never contacted me whatsoever, nor have they sent me a bill, collection notice, etc.

    The punchline: When I look at the CA-1 collection notice and look up the local phone and 800# numbers for CA-2, THEY ARE THE SAME! AND, their addresses are the same! CA-1 used a PO box in their letters to me.

    How devious and deceiptful!!! All this hassle for chump change...

    How should I fight this one?
     
  2. doodyhead

    doodyhead Well-Known Member

    yes, fight it!
     
  3. Why Chat

    Why Chat Well-Known Member

    Illegal violation of
    Section 8 of the FDCPA- False And Misleading Representations.
    (14) The use of any business, company, or organization name other than the true name of the debt collector's business, company, or organization.
     
  4. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    VIOLATION
     
  5. QUEEN_BEE

    QUEEN_BEE Well-Known Member

    Do you mean a violation other than what Why Chat mentioned above?
     
  6. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    No I meant it seems you have them on that one.
    I went back and read your post again and it looks like you might have them for trying to collect before Val.too for a total of 2 violations.
     

Share This Page