Using One Report to Dispute Another

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by robgold, Jan 10, 2004.

  1. robgold

    robgold Active Member

    I am planning to dispute some late payments on my Equifax report. My Experion report does not have those late entries listed. Should I send Equifax a copy of my Experion report to corroborate that the payment was not late, or is there a danger that Equifax might validate the late payment and then report that info to Experian? thanks!
     
  2. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    This don't work.
     
  3. jaytee

    jaytee Well-Known Member

    they dont care about your other reports. if they did, they would just all share information anyway.
     
  4. jam237

    jam237 Well-Known Member

    They don't care about *ANYTHING*...

    Its better to think of all three reports as 100% separate, Equifax even REFUSED to consider a LETTER FROM THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, that this company committed fraud, BACKED UP with a letter from the Data Furnisher that the reason my account miraculously had a zero balance was because of the FTC settlement.
     
  5. GEORGE

    GEORGE Well-Known Member

    THEY WON'T TAKE PROOF FROM THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR...why would they take anything from another CRA???
     
  6. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Equifax even REFUSED to consider a LETTER FROM THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, that this company committed fraud,
    jam237
    ==============
    So Then it's legal for the CRAs to report illegal debts Correct?

    ..
     
  7. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Using One Report to Dispute Another

    YEAH:
    They know how CRAs lie after all they r1 .
    LOL
     
  8. flacorps

    flacorps Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Using One Report to Dispute Another

    I've included statements to X that "Y and Z deleted, I believe they did so on the basis of a proper reinvestigation (and I do include photocopies of the reports where they say "deleted"), your continued failure to delete is the result of an improper reinvestigation or none at all, and now that you have been notified that Y and Z deleted, failure on your company's part to permenantly delete will constitute willful conduct justifying the imposition of punitive damages."

    Haven't got results back, we'll see how it goes. But it's a lot better than just saying "hey, these other guys deleted, so why don't you".
     

Share This Page