Violation of FDCPA means nothing?

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by Paintpro, Jan 28, 2007.

  1. Paintpro

    Paintpro Member

    I say they don't play fair only because they never validated the debt as I requested and still proceeded with collection.
    From day one I told them I was not refusing to pay but did want to know who the original creditor was and not just send a check to Unifund because they said so. They proceeded with a law suit without providing that information, saying in the summons only that it was a "Visa" card, not even supplying an original account number. I provided all that information to the court and it meant nothing.
    So be it. I said all along, to them and the judge, that I am fighting the case but should the court rule against me I would pay immediately. There would be no need to put a lien on my house or garnish my bank account and I feel it would be unfair of them if they did.
     
  2. cap1sucks

    cap1sucks Well-Known Member

    If you demanded validation within the 30 day period and they failed to comply but proceeded with collection then that is a violation of FDCPA.

    Your remedy is to sue them just as their remedy for your failure to pay is to sue you.

    That's the way the law works. I see nothing unfair about that.
     
  3. Paintpro

    Paintpro Member

    Thanks for all your help cap1.
    I've downloaded the forms and information for filing a federal law suit.
     

Share This Page