What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by BytemeCA, Dec 29, 2003.

  1. BytemeCA

    BytemeCA Well-Known Member

    Ok, I sent the Estoppel/GoodWill letter for a paid collection. I gave them 15 days to remove. Haven't received a peep, and they continue to verify on CRA...

    So what's next, send ITS? If so, anyone have a good ITS letter for a Paid Collection I want removed??

    Thanks in advance,

    Byteme
     
  2. LKH

    LKH Well-Known Member

    Can you clarify for me how ask for them to show good will and demand they delete within 15 days at the same time? I'm not sure what you are doing, but to be honest, it doesn't sound right. Would you explain in more detail what is going on?
     
  3. BytemeCA

    BytemeCA Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

    Maybe good will was stretching it abit...

    anyway, DH & I have a couple of collections, that have been paid. Well they are reporting them as paid collections. I sent them an estoppel letter with 15 days to delete. Here is the first letter I sent:

    Collection Agency

    RE:
    Account Number: xxxxxxx = Amount Paid: $115.00
    Account Number: xxxxxxx= Amount Paid: $650.00

    Dear Sir or Madam:

    It has come to our attention that you have placed a derogatory remark on our credit bureau files pursuant to our having paid you what you claimed that we owed Olympic Collections.

    When we paid you, we relied upon the belief that you would do the honorable thing and remove your nasty and derogatory comments from our credit bureau files which you not only failed to do but actually changed our listings to paid-collection which is a far worse rating in the eyes of any potential future creditors.

    In doing so, you obviously failed to realize that the Doctrine of Estoppel directly applies to this type of situation and is cause and more than sufficient grounds for our pending lawsuit against you for punitive damages in whatever amount a jury might deem appropriate for your violation of the estoppel doctrine of law.

    Here is what the Doctrine of Estoppel is and how it applies to your violations of it.
    In order for the doctrine of estoppel to apply, the party of the first part (you, the collector) must make some statement or engage in some conduct upon which we have relied and acted upon which later proved to be to our detriment or prejudice.

    In your communications with us you told us that you would update our credit reports as soon as we had paid the debt to you. Quite naturally, we assumed and relied upon your statement to that effect to mean that you would mark the account as "paid as agreed" or even quite possibly remove it entirely.

    We are quite confident that both you and a court of law will agree that such is a perfectly reasonable assumption for an average debtor to make. And so upon that assumption we agreed to pay the debt and in fact did so, whereupon you actually worsened our credit bureau scores and that was most definitely to our detriment and prejudice and provided us with grounds to sue you for the full amount paid plus attorney fees, court costs and whatever additional punitive damages a jury might award.

    Unless you move to cure your error and remove your derogatory remarks from our credit reports (Experian, Equifax and TransUnion) within 15 days of your receipt of this letter and provide proof of your cooperation with our demand in the form of mailing us a copy of your UDF which you transmitted to the credit bureaus demanding it's removal we shall immediately move to file against you in a court of law with jury trial demanded.

    We are quite well aware that you have a contractual agreement with the credit bureaus which covers this problem and supposedly prevents you from compliance with our demands but a contract which is in violation of the law is null and void and of no force and effect whatever and therefore cannot be enforced either by you or upon you. Your so-called contract with the credit bureaus will not protect you for your willful violation of our rights, which are protected by the Doctrine of Estoppel.

    Your failure to cure and provide us with proof of your having cured the problem within 15 days after your provable receipt of this letter will be considered sufficient reason to refer this matter to the courts for their resolution.

    While you may think that we have no right of private action due to the way FCRA is worded, let me hasten to assure you that such beliefs are quite ungrounded and false. That point, has been vividly pointed out by the ruling of the U.S. 9th Cir. Ct. of Appeals in the case of Nelson v Chase, March 3, 2002 in which the court pointed out that Section 1681s-2(b) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act creates a cause of action for a consumer against a furnisher of erroneous credit information. But our pending suit against you will not be about FDCPA nor FCRA but about how you have damaged us after we acted in good faith in dealing with you.


    Sincerely

    Byteme et al

    soooo...I'm asking if the ITS is next. If it is, will the below letter work??

    Collection Agency

    NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE LAWSUIT

    To Whom It May Concern:

    This letter shall serve as formal notice of my intent to file a lawsuit
    against your company, due to your blatant and objectionable disregard of the
    law.

    On December 16th, 2003, you received a letter of estoppel. Enclosed you will find a copy of the green card Return Receipt with signature on the above date. You were allotted 15 days from that date to remove your derogatory marks on each of our credit reports or prepare for a lawsuit.

    The FDCPA states you must cease collection activity until you have produced validation of the alleged debt if so requested. As per the FTC, this includes reporting to the credit bureaus, which you obviously have done illegally.

    Also, when an alleged debt is disputed, a notation must be entered on the debtors credit report showing the item as in dispute. Again, this was not done.

    I'm sure you are aware of the consequences in violating the Fair Credit
    Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as well as the
    multiple violations your company is now responsible for. If not, let me
    point them out for you.

    FCRA
    1. § 623. Responsibilities of furnishers of information to consumer
    reporting agencies [15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2] (a)(3) - Duty to provide notice of dispute.
    2. § 611. Procedure in case of disputed accuracy [15 U.S.C. § 1681i] (5) Treatment of inaccurate or unverifiable information.

    FDCPA
    1. § 805. Communication in connection with debt collection [15USC1692c] (c) Ceasing Communication
    2. § 809. Validation of debts [15 USC 1692g]

    As per the FDCPA:

    § 813. Civil liability [15 USC 1692k]
    (a) Except as otherwise provided by this section, any debt collector who fails to comply with any provision of this title with respect to any person is liable to such person in an amount equal to the sum of --
    (1) any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of such failure;
    (2) (A) in the case of any action by an individual, such additional damages as the court may allow, but not exceeding $1,000

    If you wish to resolve this matter, this will be your last opportunity to do so. The following items must be deleted from our credit files with the 3 major credit reporting bureaus (Equifax, Experian, & Trans Union) by January 5th, 2004 and you forward a copy of the UDF form to me, as well as a letter stating it has been removed and will not reappear on my credit reports again by you or another collection agency.

    Account Number: xxxxxxx = Amount Paid: $115.00
    Account Number: xxxxxxx = Amount Paid: $650.00

    Please be aware if this account is not deleted by January 5th, 2004 I will be filing a lawsuit for multiple violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. I will be seeking civil liability in the amount of $1000 per violation. Please also be aware I will file a formal complaint with the Federal Trade Commission in XXXX State, the Attorney General and the Better Business Bureau.

    Thank you and I look forward to resolving this most expeditiously.

    Sincerely,

    Byteme et al
     
  4. LKH

    LKH Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

    If you fully intend to follow thru with a lawsuit when they fail to respond, then go ahead and send it. It looks ok. I just couldn't figure out what you were saying before.
     
  5. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

    Maybe it's just me, but I think your first letter was WAAAAYYYY too wordy. It's not your job to explain to them what estoppel is or what they need to do to make things right. Remember, you're hoping for mistakes/violations here so you can get a deletion. My policy is "shorts, sweet and to the point" with my letters.

    Dear CA,

    I asked you to remove derogotory information from my credit report that is being reported in error. I have given you plenty of time to take care of this and you have failed to do so. You have XX amount of days to cure the problem, or I will be forced to exercise my rights as allowed by law.

    XOXOXo

    Consumer

    OK, I'm being over-simplistic here, but you get the idea. The three-page love notes are not going to get you anywhere, in my experience.
     
  6. LKH

    LKH Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

    The first letter was already sent. The 2nd is a followup ITS. If you are threatening to sue someone, I think you need to tell them why. I don't think a letter saying "I am suing you - correct your violations" will quite cut it.
     
  7. sassyinaz

    sassyinaz Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

    The first letter posted (non-credited) belongs and is copyrighted by Bill Bauer and is certainly not nor intended to be a goodwill letter. A goodwill letter is just that, requesting an act of goodwill from the creditor.

    http://pub50.ezboard.com/fcreditwrenchfrm2.showMessage?topicID=22.topic

    I'm flying with LKH, if you say you are going to sue, you should be prepared to follow through.

    However, per the ITS cut and pasted (you need to give credit for that too, please):

    What though are you suing for??????

    Validation doesn't ever have to be provided and specifically if paid.

    Did you send a validation letter?

    A dispute notation is only required if you disputed, did you?

    I'd not send an ITS alleging violations that don't exist.

    It's NOT a violation of the FDCPA or FCRA to report that a collection is paid.

    Sassy
     
  8. BytemeCA

    BytemeCA Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

    Sorry I didn't give credit to anyone on my letters. Unfortunately I don't remember where I got them, but thanks Sassy for giving Bill Bauer credit for the first letter. If you know the author or are the author of the second letter thank you and give yourself or whomever credit where credit is due.

    Thanks to all who assist me, I'm just a dumba$$ who can't come up with all these goodies you guys do.

    Byteme
     
  9. BytemeCA

    BytemeCA Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

    BTW, Mannequin sent the second letter to me via e-mail, it was courtesy of the LizardKing. I however, did change it up a bit. (not much but some)

    Byteme
     
  10. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will



    NOW CUT THAT OUT!!

    .
     
  11. BytemeCA

    BytemeCA Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

    But Butch it's the truth. I couldn't have gotten half the stuff fixed on mine & DH's credit reports without all of you, and various other credit forums.

    :)

    Thanks

    Byteme
     
  12. sassyinaz

    sassyinaz Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will

    oh dear ((((((((byteme))))))))))),

    Insert random cusswords here!!!!!!!! :)

    I'm sorry, I certainly didn't mean to imply you were a dumbass or anything remotely close and, I'm sure you could have written similar, if not better, letters for your own use.

    I get a wild hair about the reposting and use of letters without the credit to the authors, not credit like patting on the back or rah-rahing, though nodding, the authors deserve that credit as well. But, more to preserve the integrity of the sharing and to encourage others to do the same. They were all given freely to be shared freely, it's that spirit of learning, sharing and growing. Just as you found it, just as I did.

    ok, so that's out of the way.

    The problem is, not that the ITS you have posted isn't a fine one, wavingggggggg to Mannie, and now credited (ty ty) BUT, the violations in it aren't applicable to you unless you have done some other things.

    That's what I was asking.

    Sassy
     
  13. Butch

    Butch Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What comes after Estoppel/Good Will


    Well no it isn't the truth. We all started somewhere. And that's right where you're starting, at the beginning.


    And yes, wherever possible, or to extent that you're aware of who an author might be, do credit them for their work. We are ALL picky about that. But nobody holds it against a newbie for not knowing. :)


    Just take it easy on yourself.

    :)
     

Share This Page