What next....

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by sam1014, Mar 29, 2002.

  1. sam1014

    sam1014 Well-Known Member

    I sent a validation letter to a CA about a month ago. Yesterday, I received a computer print out from the hospital and NO signature. I called them and they told me to get it myself. What should I do now? Obviously that is not validation.
     
  2. lbrown59

    lbrown59 Well-Known Member

    Send the estoppel letter 30 days after the CA signed the green card.
     
  3. sam1014

    sam1014 Well-Known Member

    So, the hospital print-out is not validation? The CA didn't seem too concerned about me asking for the signed contract. They told me to get it myself that they supplied proof with the printout.
     
  4. LKH

    LKH Well-Known Member

    If you are going to send the ca an estoppel, attach a copy of this FTC opinion letter to it.


    Jeffrey S. Wollman
    Vice President and Controller
    Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
    1261 Broadway
    New York, New York 10001

    Dear Mr. Wollman:

    This is in response to your letter of February 9, 1993 to David Medine regarding the type of verification required by Section 809(b) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. You ask whether a collection agency for a medical provider will fulfill the requirements of that Section if it produces "an itemized statement of services rendered to a patient on its own computer from information provided by the medical institution . . .â? in response to a request for verification of the debt. You also ask who is responsible for mailing the verification to the consumer.

    The statute requires that the debt collector obtain verification of the debt and mail it to the consumer (emphasis mine). Because one of the principal purposes of this Section is to help consumers who have been misidentified by the debt collector or who dispute the amount of the debt, it is important that the verification of the identity of the consumer and the amount of the debt be obtained directly from the creditor. Mere itemization of what the debt collector already has does not accomplish this purpose. As stated above, the statute requires the debt collector, not the creditor, to mail the verification to the consumer.

    Your interest in writing is appreciated. Please be aware that since this is only the opinion of Commission staff, the Commission itself is not bound by it.

    Sincerely,

    John F. LeFevre
    Attorney
    Division of Credit Practices
     

Share This Page