Hello again, Can someone please explain to me what the difference is between a contract that is signed "under seal" and an ordinary contract with re; to the SOL? Thank you, Jane
I don't think there is any difference, but I'm not a lawyer. The definition of contract under seal is as follows: "contract under seal - a contract that is signed and has the (wax) seal of the signer attached" Im either case I think a valid contract exists as long as it's signed by the two parties
