When unvalidated colls reappear?

Discussion in 'Credit Talk' started by kseab, Apr 12, 2005.

  1. kseab

    kseab Well-Known Member

    I like to call it "When CAs attack."

    We have previously unvalidated med collections which were removed - I even have the "sorry" letter from the CA to prove it!

    It just reappeared in 2/05 and when I called today they fell all over themselves being nice "we didn't report it but we'll send through to remove it right away!"

    So ... do I just let it pass or is there something MORE I should be doing? I don't want to have to pay for credit watch just to know when this invalid collection reappears every year.

    Not to mention, can't a CA be fined for this?
     
  2. pd11604

    pd11604 Well-Known Member

    It is a violation of the FDCPA for a CA to "continue collection activity" without providing proper validation when it is requested by the consumer.
    Making an entry on your CR is a collection activity and a $1000 penalty should you choose to sue them

    The CRA also violated the FCBA for reinserting a previously deleted TL unless they notified you it was reinserted
     
  3. pd11604

    pd11604 Well-Known Member

    If "they" didn't report it then who did? Also, if "they" didn't report it, what authority do "they" have to remove it?
     
  4. kseab

    kseab Well-Known Member

    Nope - no notification.

    So ... how do I get my thousand bucks? Is this a small claims court thing or is there some "FCRA Police station I visit ;-) ?
     
  5. pd11604

    pd11604 Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: When unvalidated colls reappear?

    yes
    (you might wish to run the whole thing by a lawyer to make sure you have a solid case)
     
  6. kseab

    kseab Well-Known Member

    Re: Re: When unvalidated colls reappear?

    Thank you!

    Since I have correspondence on this from last year clearly stating "we will remove this ASAP - we were wrong" basically, I don't see how they have any valid reason to re-insert it.

    Of course, it's frustrating because I have another one right now also removed in like 2002 and another CA not only re-listed but changed the date to say it was PAID in 2002 but "balance 0 Nov. 2004"
    Doesn't that effectively re-age it?
     

Share This Page